FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
School children warned not to use Wikipedia -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> School children warned not to use Wikipedia
Cock-up-over-conspiracy
post
Post #1


Now censored by flckr.com and who else ... ???
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,693
Joined:
Member No.: 9,267



Did we miss this? ... Schoolchildren told to avoid Wikipedia from The Telegraph - Graeme Paton, Education Editor Published: 06 Jan 2010
QUOTE
Children should use Google and Yahoo to improve their essays, according to the official exams watchdog.

Ofqual said putting keywords into internet search engines was a “good starting point” when researching pieces of coursework and dissertations.

But guidance sent out to schoolchildren in England warns pupils to be extremely wary when using other websites such as Wikipedia.

The on-line encyclopaedia – created using contributions from readers – was not “authoritative or accurate” and in some cases “may be completely untrue”, said Ofqual.

Children can also be easily tripped up by copying passages from websites containing American phrases and spellings – a clear sign of plagiarism.

The comments were made in a series of documents sent to pupils, parents and teachers warning against cheating at school.



Ofqual is the UK Government's Office of the Qualifications and Examinations Regulator.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Apathetic
post
Post #2


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 594
Joined:
Member No.: 7,383



Surprising that they would prefer children entering words into a search engine and using their own judgment as to what links are relevant and factual, but discourage them from a collaborative, sourced, peer reviewed work like Wikipedia.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sarcasticidealist
post
Post #3


Head exploded.
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,662
Joined:
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Member No.: 4,536



QUOTE(Apathetic @ Fri 12th February 2010, 9:35pm) *
...but discourage them from a collaborative, sourced, peer reviewed work like Wikipedia.
I do not think that "peer reviewed" means what you think it means.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Apathetic
post
Post #4


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 594
Joined:
Member No.: 7,383



QUOTE(Sarcasticidealist @ Fri 12th February 2010, 9:06pm) *

QUOTE(Apathetic @ Fri 12th February 2010, 9:35pm) *
...but discourage them from a collaborative, sourced, peer reviewed work like Wikipedia.
I do not think that "peer reviewed" means what you think it means.

As BelovedFox guessed, I was using the term fairly loosely
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post
Post #5


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066



QUOTE(Apathetic @ Sat 13th February 2010, 6:19pm) *
QUOTE(Sarcasticidealist @ Fri 12th February 2010, 9:06pm) *
QUOTE(Apathetic @ Fri 12th February 2010, 9:35pm) *
...but discourage them from a collaborative, sourced, peer reviewed work like Wikipedia.
I do not think that "peer reviewed" means what you think it means.
As BelovedFox guessed, I was using the term fairly loosely

The word you're looking for is "ironic".

This post has been edited by EricBarbour:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)