QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Mon 27th February 2012, 3:21pm)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?t...&oldid=67609655:
QUOTE
{{vk}} I see blue top and skin colour bikini bottom. What do you see? It illustrates a young girls Sukumizu with two parts. Seems to me she is even way past puberty. Honi soit qui mal y pense! --[[User:Paddy|Paddy]] ([[User talk:Paddy|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 19:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?t...&oldid=67610393:
QUOTE
{{vk}}, agree with analysis by {{user|Niabot}}. And also {{user|Paddy}} has it right — it's a skin-colour bikini bottom. -- '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Why are these people claiming to
know that it's a "skin-colour bikini bottom"? How do they know the intentions of the artist / uploader? Can they read the artist's mind from behind a computer screen? How many children wear skin-colored swimwear? How many parents want their children to be paraded around a school pool in skin-colored swimwear? The people on Commons are denying the obvious and are making up excuses for the uploader to use later.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?t...&oldid=67623145:
QUOTE
{{vk}}:Uh...I think it's not child pornography, and users could use it on "Hentai" or "Ecchi".The quality is poor because it is created by mouse...--[[User:KOKUYO|KOKUYO]] ([[User talk:KOKUYO|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 03:48, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
This is a comment by the image's creator. The text in bold obviously indicates that it
is supposed to be a bottomless lolicon. Paddy and Cirt are wrong.