Yet Another Thread For Collecting Mal-Assorted Off-Topic Posts
Posted by: Moulton
So much for Inquiry, eh?
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(Moulton @ Mon 21st June 2010, 12:28pm)
So much for Inquiry, eh?
I didn't know you were Canadian …
Jon
Posted by: Moulton
Most cryptograms look like nonsense at first glance.
The real challenge is to get a message across that can be transparently coded in a single glance.
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(Moulton @ Thu 8th July 2010, 7:46am)
Most cryptograms look like nonsense at first glance.
The real challenge is to get a message across that can be transparently coded in a single glance.
Σ Ø ν
Read it as "nothing nu under the SUM"
Posted by: Moulton
Thanks for shedding some light on the subject and clearing away the fog.
Is there anything new here to spend time contemplating?
Posted by: Zoloft
I believe you are dividing by zero.
This only leads to tears.
Posted by: dogbiscuit
QUOTE(Zoloft @ Fri 9th July 2010, 10:39am)
I believe you are dividing by zero.
This only leads to tears.
or infinity if you can do the math.
Posted by: ulsterman
QUOTE(Zoloft @ Fri 9th July 2010, 10:39am)
I believe you are dividing by zero.
This only leads to tears.
No the denominator isn't necessarily zero. Sometimes you see two digit numbers where the first digit is zero. Dates are often written like that: 03/06/09.
Posted by: Zoloft
QUOTE(ulsterman @ Fri 9th July 2010, 9:09pm)
QUOTE(Zoloft @ Fri 9th July 2010, 10:39am)
I believe you are dividing by zero.
This only leads to tears.
No the denominator isn't necessarily zero. Sometimes you see two digit numbers where the first digit is zero. Dates are often written like that: 03/06/09.
So that would mean you were using base=nu-squared+n where n is indeterminate...
Or a non-cardinal number...
Perhaps even Uncle Rebus.
Posted by: Moulton
Well, Dr. Roe, shall we expiate our sins?
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(Moulton @ Fri 9th July 2010, 11:11pm)
Well, Dr. Roe, shall we expiate our sins?
I'm thinking it will be easier to x-tirpate your signs —