The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> 

This forum is populated by RSS feeds from various news sources. Members may start topics here and reply to them, but please limit new topics to links to actual news stories. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to the Wikipedia:Glossary.

For accurate information about the "Wikipedia vs. Britannica" study by Nature, please read this.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> How Crazy Was Last Year? The 15 Most Controversial Wikipedia Articles Paint a Dark Picture - Haaretz
Newsfeed
post Wed 10th January 2018, 9:37am
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm
Member No.: 2,885



[url="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNE-IU_Mva1bi5J60I2Pek9gZpZoIA&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&ei=2zdWWviEG8THqgKC75rwCQ&url=https://www.haaretz.com/.premium-1.834040"][img]https://t1.gstatic.com/images? q=tbn:ANd9GcQXSFaIYpTsfHepwsGB2Fl0br7R878jkOSnzBLErJjfpOWBoF8JXMGkBFaaBV_MF8Euaq

YD_BGt[/img]
Haaretz[/url]
How Crazy Was Last Year? The 15 Most Controversial Wikipedia Articles Paint a Dark Picture
Haaretz
A gallery assistant working on a waxwork of U.S. President Donald Trump in the Madame Tussauds wax museum in Berlin, October 17, 2017. FABRIZIO BENSCH/REUTERS. Sex, lies and Wikipedia: Pro-Palestinian editors accused of protecting Linda Sarsour over ...



View the article
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd 1 18, 8:24am