FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Broadcasting standards -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> 

This forum is populated by RSS feeds from various news sources. Members may start topics here and reply to them, but please limit new topics to links to actual news stories. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to the Wikipedia:Glossary.

For accurate information about the "Wikipedia vs. Britannica" study by Nature, please read this.

> Broadcasting standards, Here
Rating  4
Selina
post
Post #1


Cat herder
******

Group: Staffy
Posts: 1,513
Joined:
Member No.: 1



Icons:
When topics have articles from multiple sources on the same subject, the topic should have this icon:
(IMG:http://wikipediareview.com/stimg9x0b4fsr2/1/folder_post_icons/icon10.gif)

All topics by users (yes, this is not just for RSS imports, feel free to alert us to any news The Net didn't catch), or that have been flagged as more interesting should have this icon:
(IMG:http://wikipediareview.com/stimg9x0b4fsr2/1/folder_post_icons/icon11.gif)

Deletions:
  • Links to articles that are exact duplicates of a previously posted article will be deleted. The first news publication to publish that article gets the right to stay. The only exception to this will be when a far less-read website publishes something and a hugely popular other website mirrors for it. An example would be something on a niche technical website getting mirrored onto CNN.
  • "Articles" that are nothing more than a copy/paste of an article from a Wikimedia project.
  • Forum topics (with RSS feeds) that are not about any Wikimedia project but only mention it.
Moves:
Articles that are not about a Wikimedia project (such as Wikipedia) will be mass-moved to the "Less Relevant" subforum. Even if it uses Wikipedia only as a source or something to refer to for information it still gives an idea of how much the Media is using Wikipedia/aware of it/uses it. When a major publication (such as the BBC or CNN) links or uses Wikipedia as a source it should probably be flagged with (IMG:http://wikipediareview.com/stimg9x0b4fsr2/1/folder_post_icons/icon11.gif), but still moved to Less Relevant unless it's actually about Wikimedia/Wikipedia.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)