Elonka&JayJG v ChrisO Options

[Hipocrite]

Reference (static as of right now) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...ersian_problems

After apparently getting repelled by anti-kook forces in her attempt to drive off ScienceApologist, Elonka has redirected her endless rage against people who actually went to college for more than just one year before failing out, and have some level of expertise in what they talk about at ChrisO, who is a phD historian editing in his field of expertise. Because of lunatic Iranian Nationalists and Ancient Hebrew apologists (I shit you not - this is about things done in 600 BC) being opposed to an accurate picture of history, ChrisO's historically accurate edits are opposed by both Iranian ex-pats and "Israel can do no wrong" agenda editors, in addition to Elonka's continuing crusade against anyone who knows something she doesn't.

Worth reading.



Oh, and hi.




More offensive, of course, is JayJG's statement that ChrisO protecting a page in his userspace is "The use of admin tools (protecting the page twice) in an edit dispute would seem to make it an AN/I issue."

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...partheid_editor

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...partheid_editor


This post has been edited by Hipocrite:

[EuroSceptic]

Ottava, with your idea of how things should be decided, evolution is not existing in the US and the world is created in 6 days, if we would let the majority rule. Unfortunately, the majority mob rule is not the same as the truth, and this is exactly why wikipedia is failing.

[Ottava]

Ottava, with your idea of how things should be decided, evolution is not existing in the US and the world is created in 6 days, if we would let the majority rule. Unfortunately, the majority mob rule is not the same as the truth, and this is exactly why wikipedia is failing.

EuroSceptic, do you really think consensus on Wikipedia points to such a conclusion? You can throw out such things, but it does not match what Wikipedia has.






Because the moderators thought it would be funny to put this up:

"Flood control is enabled on this board, please wait 3600 seconds before replying or posting a new topic"

I have placed my response here.

The fact that Somey tries to make it seem that consensus building process, which welcomes all, is some how equal to mass murder is absolutely outrageous and only proves that he hasn't a clue what he is actually talking about.

"
Why do you even defend them, Ottava? You've been blocked on Wikipedia all sorts of times. They obviously don't like you or your "ideas" any more than most of us do, which is not at all."

Yes, because my "ideas" were the reason why I was blocked. Oh wait, my editing skill was the reason why so many people kept coming to my defense when I would be blocked for REVERT WARRING, especially on certain pages like NLT when admin try to change it against consensus.

Funny how that happens.

This post has been edited by Ottava:

[Somey]

Because the moderators thought it would be funny to put this up:

"Flood control is enabled on this board, please wait 3600 seconds before replying or posting a new topic"

I have placed my response here.

Well, I laughed... So hard, in fact, that I just changed your 24-hour edit-time limit to 5 minutes! My goodness, I'm just laughing hysterically at this point.

The fact that Somey tries to make it seem that consensus building process, which welcomes all, is some how equal to mass murder is absolutely outrageous and only proves that he hasn't a clue what he is actually talking about.

"Welcomes all"? Um, no, but you're right about the other thing - in many ways, it's worse than mass murder. Mass murder only kills people, who would eventually die anyway. Moreover, they can rise up, defend themselves, fight back. What you apparently want to kill is the very basis of truth itself, and truth is a very fragile thing in the face of people like yourself who are determined to destroy it.

Assuming you aren't faking this whole thing, of course...

Yes, because my "ideas" were the reason why I was blocked.

OK, I'm now 100 percent convinced that you're faking this whole thing.

Funny how that happens.

Hardy har-har.

[dtobias]

"Welcomes all"? Um, no, but you're right about the other thing - in many ways, it's worse than mass murder. Mass murder only kills people, who would eventually die anyway. Moreover, they can rise up, defend themselves, fight back.

Killed people rising up and fighting back? Is this like Dawn of the Dead?