The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

3 Pages V < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Quora
EricBarbour
post Sun 11th March 2012, 2:09am
Post #41


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Would anyone like to try and claim that Wikipedia is NOT-MISOGYNISTIC?

If so, please explain Category:suspension bondage.
Only two of the 56 images show men being tortured and/or killed.

This post has been edited by EricBarbour: Sun 11th March 2012, 2:10am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mister Die
post Sun 11th March 2012, 2:42am
Post #42


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun 29th Jan 2012, 11:32pm
Member No.: 75,644

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Those inclined towards men are too busy photographing their anuses to tend to that shortage at the moment.

Edit: Also the Spanking category has this helpful notice: "Please note that low-quality images with no realistic educational use nor a purpose within the Wikimedia projects may be deleted. For further information, see Commons:Nudity."

Unfortunately they have 102 (arguably 103) photos more than is necessary for "realistic educational use."

Edit II: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bo%...3%A0_gifles.jpg

One of the three images in the "Spanking machines" category, the only one worksafe.

This post has been edited by Mister Die: Sun 11th March 2012, 4:51am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Sun 11th March 2012, 6:02am
Post #43


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(jsalsman @ Fri 9th March 2012, 10:25pm) *


Is there an alternative hypothesis explaining ... the steadily increasing age of sexual activity onset coincident with wider internet availability here in the US?

Image

Sure, that's easy. Over the period of the study, the population of Hispanics in the United States has increased dramatically, especially in the childhood and teen age cohorts. They are more likely to be Catholic, and thus adhere to a more conservative approach toward sexuality (i.e., abstinence), so we are seeing the impact of this demographic seismic shift in the age of onset of sexual activity. Thankfully, the increased use and availability of Internet porn isn't having much to do with increasing the sexual activity among (Catholic) Hispanics, because of the digital divide (i.e., Hispanics are not as likely as non-Hispanics to be connected to the Internet).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jsalsman
post Sun 11th March 2012, 6:57am
Post #44


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue 21st Feb 2012, 6:57pm
Member No.: 76,279



QUOTE(thekohser @ Sat 10th March 2012, 11:02pm) *
the population of Hispanics in the United States has increased dramatically, especially in the childhood and teen age cohorts. They are more likely to be Catholic, and thus adhere to a more conservative approach toward sexuality (i.e., abstinence), so we are seeing the impact of this demographic seismic shift in the age of onset of sexual activity.
That might have something to do with it, but I'm not sure 35 million Hispanics in 2000 to 50 million at present can completely explain the magnitudes of kids waiting to have sex. Other kids have to be waiting longer too, don't they? If it was 0 to 50 million over the same time period, those figures would be about the size, assuming all Hispanics never have sex as teens, which isn't right either. It turns out Hispanics get pregnant about 50% more often than most kids, but I don't know how much of that is due to birth control taboos.
Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Zoloft
post Sun 11th March 2012, 7:56am
Post #45


May we all find solace in our dreams.
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,332
Joined: Fri 15th Jan 2010, 11:08pm
From: Erewhon
Member No.: 16,621



• As the Baby Boomers age, the visible population becomes less sexually engaging.
• The obesity epidemic is reducing testosterone levels in pubescent males.
• As sex is associated with crazy people on television and the Internet, it becomes something to be avoided by youths.
irony.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HRIP7
post Wed 14th March 2012, 6:20am
Post #46


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 483
Joined: Sat 6th Feb 2010, 3:58pm
Member No.: 17,020

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Another Quora question:

Is Wikipedia in general inaccurate? If not, why is it believed to be so?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Fusion
post Wed 14th March 2012, 12:18pm
Post #47


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue 29th Nov 2011, 12:40pm
Member No.: 71,526



QUOTE(HRIP7 @ Wed 14th March 2012, 6:20am) *

Amazing. Thoughtful answers that on the whole seem very plausible and are by no means 100% pro-Wikipedia. (Ignore the last very short reply!) I find it hard to know if the picture they paint is slightly too rosy, though I am inclined to believe it is. However, it is no whitewash.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd 5 13, 2:38am