The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Sock Puppetry Destroying Publishing?
Ottava
post Mon 3rd September 2012, 9:52pm
Post #1


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



This story about fake book reviews is deeply intertwined with the problems rife on Wikipedia - lots of internet sources that are either produced way too fast (and thus not yet corrected), things rushed and not based on full information, or on shoddy merits.

This is one of the dangers with people who boast about "Web 2.0" (that isn't even a real thing, there is either the internet or not, screw the rest of it). When anonymity dominates and there is no check, crap takes over.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eppur si muove
post Tue 4th September 2012, 8:34pm
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 304
Joined: Fri 28th Nov 2008, 10:50pm
Member No.: 9,171



And just like on Wikipedia, meatpuppetry is also a problem. A friend fo mine found a book that plagiarised his website and also Wikipedia. One of the positive reviews of the book was written by a colleague of the "author" who appears in the acknowledgments. Said work colleague has blogged about plagiarism but his scruples about that do not apply when recommending a friend's book.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post Wed 5th September 2012, 2:28am
Post #3


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Tue 4th September 2012, 4:34pm) *

And just like on Wikipedia, meatpuppetry is also a problem. A friend fo mine found a book that plagiarised his website and also Wikipedia. One of the positive reviews of the book was written by a colleague of the "author" who appears in the acknowledgments. Said work colleague has blogged about plagiarism but his scruples about that do not apply when recommending a friend's book.



Adam Smith suggested that the reason why 18th century poets formed cabals to destroy each other and that scientists did not is because the poets had far more to gain and lose. The people didn't really care about the scientists and it was immune.

If you look closely, he had a strong point about human nature. When you can gain popularity/power/money, or whatever else, humans tend to join together to screw each other in any way possible. It no longer becomes merit but greed. I strongly believe in Confucius's meritocracy. However, Confucius was consistently chased out of different kingdoms because of how it prevented certain people from gaining power who do not deserve it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DoctorHver
post Fri 30th November 2012, 5:28pm
Post #4


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat 26th Jan 2008, 12:58am
Member No.: 4,593



I thought wikipedia was the playground for copyright in-fragments and plagiarism.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th 8 17, 10:42am