The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Funniest sock-puppetry ever
EricBarbour
post Tue 29th June 2010, 3:02am
Post #1


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



It happened recently on a blog for discussion of atheism, called You're Not Helping.
(Yes, it's been locked by the owner. Apparently because he's crazy, and totally
intolerant of criticism.)

You can read the whole twisted story here.

It's got everything Wikipedia has, in microcosm.
Egomania, abuse, lying, manipulation, abusive sockpuppetry
to support a bogus POV, and even perma-banning followed
by hostile offsite propagandizing.

This post has been edited by EricBarbour: Tue 29th June 2010, 3:03am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chrisoff
post Tue 29th June 2010, 3:35pm
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu 18th Feb 2010, 11:20pm
Member No.: 17,248



Haha. It does follow the Wikipedia storyline quite well. The obsession with sockpuppets and the "detective" work.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Subtle Bee
post Tue 29th June 2010, 4:23pm
Post #3


melli fera, fera...
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue 9th Mar 2010, 3:06pm
Member No.: 17,787



QUOTE(chrisoff @ Tue 29th June 2010, 8:35am) *

Haha. It does follow the Wikipedia storyline quite well. The obsession with sockpuppets and the "detective" work.

Well, you can't have a proper drama unless everyone stays on script. smile.gif

OT, I propose "obsession" as the collective noun for sockpuppets.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th 11 17, 11:20pm