FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Has Wikipedia Created a Rorschach Cheat Sheet? - New York Times -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Has Wikipedia Created a Rorschach Cheat Sheet? - New York Times
Newsfeed
post
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined:
Member No.: 2,885
Has Wikipedia Created a Rorschach Cheat Sheet? New York Times
There are tests that have right answers, which are returned with a number on top in a red circle, and there are tests with open-ended ...
View the article
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
dtobias
post
Post #2


Obsessive trolling idiot [per JzG]
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,213
Joined:
From: Boca Raton, FL, USA
Member No.: 962
So far, it seems like in pretty much every one of these cases where people here on WR have declared Wikipedia / Wikimedia to have shown itself publicly as reckless, irresponsible, harmful, and all of that other stuff, the end result has been that the general public finds it mildly funny but doesn't really care, the techie crowd actively sides with Wikipedia, and everybody keeps on using Wikipedia just as much as (or more than) before. Meanwhile, whatever institution is on the other side of the controversy either backs off completely or reaches some kind of uneasy truce where everybody can let the fight simmer down. There hasn't yet been anything even vaguely resembling the decisive victory over Wikipedia that you guys have been hoping for.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GlassBeadGame
post
Post #3


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined:
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981
QUOTE(dtobias @ Mon 3rd August 2009, 5:09pm) *

So far, it seems like in pretty much every one of these cases where people here on WR have declared Wikipedia / Wikimedia to have shown itself publicly as reckless, irresponsible, harmful, and all of that other stuff, the end result has been that the general public finds it mildly funny but doesn't really care, the techie crowd actively sides with Wikipedia, and everybody keeps on using Wikipedia just as much as (or more than) before. Meanwhile, whatever institution is on the other side of the controversy either backs off completely or reaches some kind of uneasy truce where everybody can let the fight simmer down. There hasn't yet been anything even vaguely resembling the decisive victory over Wikipedia that you guys have been hoping for.


Essjay. Seigenthaler.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post
Post #4


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Mon 3rd August 2009, 8:01pm) *

Essjay. Seigenthaler.


Doran. Marsden. Wikia Search.

This post has been edited by thekohser:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Newsfeed   Has Wikipedia Created a Rorschach Cheat Sheet? - New York Times  
Apathetic   'Twas only a matter of time...  
Malleus   The Rorschach test was secretive crap anyway, so w...  
dtobias   Since those inkblots were published before 1923, t...  
Jon Awbrey   Same Ol' Same Ol' — Wikipediots, h...  
GlassBeadGame   Since those inkblots were published before 1923, ...  
dtobias   I didn't know Mensa didn't use full safeg...  
GlassBeadGame   [quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='186260' date='W...  
Apathetic   Fox video wherein one anchorman gives a mock Rorsc...  
Somey   So Mensa employees a psychologist who does not adh...  
Milton Roe   [quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='186306' date='W...  
Apathetic   Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Rorschach_test_imag...  
Cla68   Why don't psychologists want the Rorschach ima...  
CharlotteWebb   Is there any reason not to merge this with the pre...  
Apathetic   (or vice versa, I don't see how it fits in ...  
dtobias   I don't support anybody having a "right t...  
Jon Awbrey   I don't support anybody having a "right ...  
dtobias   I don't support anybody having a "right...  
Jon Awbrey   [quote name='Jon Awbrey' post='186255' date='Wed ...  
MBisanz   It would appear the comments are trending 33-1 in ...  
Kelly Martin   The Rorschach blots are routinely used for very qu...  
Jon Awbrey   The Rorschach blots are routinely used for very q...  
GlassBeadGame   The Rorschach blots are routinely used for very q...  
Kelly Martin   Currently, however, psychologists undergo accredit...  
GlassBeadGame   [quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='186267' date='W...  
Kelly Martin   I'm certain that you are aware that their are ...  
Jon Awbrey   Those safeguards are routinely circumvented in so...  
LaraLove   Those safeguards are routinely circumvented in s...  
GlassBeadGame   [quote name='Jon Awbrey' post='186276' date='Wed ...  
GlassBeadGame   [quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='186272' date='W...  
Jon Awbrey   The takeaway from this whole situation is that Wi...  
Malleus   And if a psychologist gets you declared mentally i...  
LaraLove   I just clicked through the ten plates. Results of ...  
zvook   I realized this had become very public when I read...  

 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)