The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Conference: "The World that Wikipedia Made", featuring Mike Godwin
Herschelkrustofsky
post Tue 29th April 2008, 6:54am
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



An alert faculty member at the University of Santa Clara sent us this notice of the upcoming conference, to be held on May 15.
QUOTE
Wikipedia is ubiquitous on the Web. A search for any obscure information is likely to wind up in a link to one of its entries (try 'sardines' or 'Transylvania' on Google for example). It is an incredible boon: a huge information repository, which has been generated in a few short years. But Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia in the traditional sense; administrators are not always experts in the fields they edit, and the project's consensus editing model has its detractors. Entries on contested issues, such as the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, have been the site of protracted editing wars between opponents.


It looks like it may be a quasi-debate between Mike Godwin and a Wikipedia critic by the name of Carl Hewitt:
QUOTE
"Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia because of censorship by its Administrators, instant publishing of anonymously submitted content, lack of accountability, and disrespect for expertise." --Carl Hewitt
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Tue 29th April 2008, 10:26am
Post #2


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Carl Hewitt is an Emeritus Professor of MIT who was unceremoniously banned, primarily for daring to edit his own biography.

Ironically, Mike Godwin also admits to having edited his own biography.

Hewitt sets forth the somewhat tedious details of his initial complaint here.

The Guardian carried a story about his banning. I personally invited the journalist who wrote that story to answer her critics here, but she declined to respond to my invitation.

This post has been edited by Moulton: Tue 29th April 2008, 10:43am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
guy
post Tue 29th April 2008, 11:49am
Post #3


Postmaster General
*********

Group: Inactive
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 8:52pm
From: London
Member No.: 23



QUOTE(Moulton @ Tue 29th April 2008, 11:26am) *

she declined to respond to my invitation.

She's been brainwashed, alas.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Wed 14th May 2008, 4:26am
Post #4


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



Apparently Mr. Godwin has "bowed out" of this event:

http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focus...pedia-panel.htm

...and I guess it was too late to replace him, since it's only two days away. Hard cheese on them - it's not much of a "panel discussion" when you have just one guest and one moderator...!

So I wonder why Godwin ditched? Is he too busy with WMF damage control these days, what with the Erik Moeller story and all the porn-related stuff? SCU isn't that far from San Franscisco, so I'd assume it isn't a travel-related issue, unless he was called away to Singapore all of a sudden.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kato
post Wed 14th May 2008, 4:35am
Post #5


dhd
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767



According to Valleywag

http://valleywag.com/390155/wikipedia-lawy...-of-ethics-talk

"But in the face of a groundswell of criticism of Wikipedia — that its frontman, Jimmy Wales, is corrupt; that its executive director, Sue Gardner, is power-mad; and that its deputy director, Erik Möller, is dangerously out of touch with potential donors' views — Godwin has remained silent."

Let's be clear, the idea that a representative of Wikipedia would appear at a forum to discuss "ethics and values" seems so incongruous that in retrospect, Godwin's probably made a safer choice by staying away.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Wed 14th May 2008, 4:56am
Post #6


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Kato @ Wed 14th May 2008, 12:35am) *

Let's be clear, the idea that a representative of Wikipedia would appear at a forum to discuss "ethics and values" seems so incongruous that in retrospect, Godwin's probably made a safer choice by staying away.


Indeed, the University would have had to set aside 40 minutes for pure, sustained laughter once audience members started to put these elements together.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Wed 14th May 2008, 5:06am
Post #7


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(Kato @ Tue 13th May 2008, 11:35pm) *
Let's be clear, the idea that a representative of Wikipedia would appear at a forum to discuss "ethics and values" seems so incongruous that in retrospect, Godwin's probably made a safer choice by staying away.

Hmm. I can see why he wouldn't want to get ambushed over the Erik Moeller allegations, but you'd think he (and they) would have come up with at least some sort of excuse - not having one just leads to speculation that they're clamming up to protect themselves from angry mobs. (Ironic though that may be.) Then again, people will probably think that no matter what they say, so saying something will just lead to additional speculation that they're lying, too.

One of the Valleywag commenters kinda-sorta hinted that Godwin may now be realizing that he made a Bad Career Move in taking the WMF job, which I could certainly agree with. If only he'd spent some time on Wikipedia Review beforehand, we might have talked him out of it! sad.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Wed 14th May 2008, 5:50am
Post #8


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Time to bathe the chickens.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd 5 13, 8:55am