The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> SlimVirgin RfC?
Bob Boy
post Fri 28th March 2008, 10:42am
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue 20th Nov 2007, 3:07pm
Member No.: 3,899



Looks like Cla68 is working on it...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cla68/Sandbox/RfC_draft
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Unrepentant Vandal
post Fri 28th March 2008, 11:04am
Post #2


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 6th Sep 2006, 12:38pm
Member No.: 394



This I like
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dogbiscuit
post Fri 28th March 2008, 11:15am
Post #3


Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more?
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2,972
Joined: Tue 4th Dec 2007, 12:42am
From: The Midlands
Member No.: 4,015



QUOTE(Unrepentant Vandal @ Fri 28th March 2008, 11:04am) *

This I like


Slightly unfortunate to raise this so early and give it public attention. But as it is here, it is telling to note that Cla's very first comments involve Crum's interference.

I'm also not sure about the timing. I wasn't particularly aware of any extra special Sliminess around at the moment. OTOH that probably makes it a more appropriate time.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Unrepentant Vandal
post Fri 28th March 2008, 11:48am
Post #4


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 6th Sep 2006, 12:38pm
Member No.: 394



I'm sure slim stalks cla68's contributions.. she'll know about this.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Herschelkrustofsky
post Fri 28th March 2008, 2:39pm
Post #5


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Unrepentant Vandal @ Fri 28th March 2008, 4:48am) *

I'm sure slim stalks cla68's contributions.. she'll know about this.
I'm sure she reads this sub-forum.


This section is particularly telling.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Fri 28th March 2008, 2:49pm
Post #6


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



The theme that emerges is one of power politics and systematic manipulation and corruption of the conflict resolution process.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dogbiscuit
post Fri 28th March 2008, 3:20pm
Post #7


Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more?
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2,972
Joined: Tue 4th Dec 2007, 12:42am
From: The Midlands
Member No.: 4,015



QUOTE(Moulton @ Fri 28th March 2008, 2:49pm) *

The theme that emerges is one of power politics and systematic manipulation and corruption of the conflict resolution process.


I'm not convinced there is a rational dispute resolution process to corrupt. She was quite good at "La La La I'm not listening." Was that what you were thinking of?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Fri 28th March 2008, 3:22pm
Post #8


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



The principle means of conflict resolution is to clear the enemy pieces off the chess board.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
guy
post Fri 28th March 2008, 5:41pm
Post #9


Postmaster General
*********

Group: Inactive
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 8:52pm
From: London
Member No.: 23



QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Fri 28th March 2008, 3:20pm) *

I'm not convinced there is a rational dispute resolution process to corrupt. She was quite good at "La La La I'm not listening." Was that what you were thinking of?

In my experience, if she's called to mediation she says "Nothing to do with me guv, I was just offering impartial advice to both sides".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wikiwhistle
post Fri 28th March 2008, 5:50pm
Post #10


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,928
Joined: Mon 26th Nov 2007, 2:17pm
Member No.: 3,953



QUOTE(guy @ Fri 28th March 2008, 5:41pm) *


In my experience, if she's called to mediation she says "Nothing to do with me guv, I was just offering impartial advice to both sides".


How's about 'help me! I'm being stalked!'
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dtobias
post Fri 28th March 2008, 6:16pm
Post #11


Obsessive trolling idiot [per JzG]
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,213
Joined: Sun 11th Feb 2007, 2:45pm
From: Boca Raton, FL, USA
Member No.: 962

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



The evidence section is still rather slim. Hopefully, once it loses its virginity, it will expand out.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bluevictim
post Fri 28th March 2008, 6:41pm
Post #12


Anonymous Pro-fake-or of Theology
**

Group: You Don't Want to Know
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue 4th Mar 2008, 9:40pm
From: USA
Member No.: 5,264



I hope Cla68 doesn't get banned. He and Giano are two of the people I like on there because they are not afraid to speak their mind. I feel glad that someone finally questioned Guy, Slim, and Crum's actions and isn't getting banned for "trolling" and isn't going to let their poor conduct slide. I don't think people should have let this pass by, and thanks to Cla68 who didn't.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jonny Cache
post Fri 28th March 2008, 6:48pm
Post #13


τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(bluevictim @ Fri 28th March 2008, 2:41pm) *

I hope Cla68 doesn't get banned. He and Giano are two of the people I like on there because they are not afraid to speak their mind. I feel glad that someone finally questioned Guy, Slim, and Crum's actions and isn't getting banned for "trolling" and isn't going to let their poor conduct slide. I don't think people should have let this pass by, and thanks to Cla68 who didn't.


"their mind"? "their mind"!

Are you telling me that Cla68 and Giano are the same person, too !?

Jonny cool.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bluevictim
post Fri 28th March 2008, 6:56pm
Post #14


Anonymous Pro-fake-or of Theology
**

Group: You Don't Want to Know
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue 4th Mar 2008, 9:40pm
From: USA
Member No.: 5,264



QUOTE(Jonny Cache @ Fri 28th March 2008, 11:48am) *

QUOTE(bluevictim @ Fri 28th March 2008, 2:41pm) *

I hope Cla68 doesn't get banned. He and Giano are two of the people I like on there because they are not afraid to speak their mind. I feel glad that someone finally questioned Guy, Slim, and Crum's actions and isn't getting banned for "trolling" and isn't going to let their poor conduct slide. I don't think people should have let this pass by, and thanks to Cla68 who didn't.


"their mind"? "their mind"!

Are you telling me that Cla68 and Giano are the same person, too !?

Jonny cool.gif

"their minds" is what I meant, and no, I'm not saying they are the same. I thought of the expression "speak [one's] mind" and forgot that I was using it in the plural form because of that expression's commonly used singular form.

This post has been edited by bluevictim: Fri 28th March 2008, 6:57pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Unrepentant Vandal
post Fri 28th March 2008, 6:57pm
Post #15


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 6th Sep 2006, 12:38pm
Member No.: 394



QUOTE(dtobias @ Fri 28th March 2008, 6:16pm) *

The evidence section is still rather slim. Hopefully, once it loses its virginity, it will expand out.


Sounds like my last girlfriend
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jonny Cache
post Fri 28th March 2008, 7:00pm
Post #16


τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(bluevictim @ Fri 28th March 2008, 2:56pm) *

"their minds" is what I meant, and no, I'm not saying they are the same. I thought of the expression "speak [one's] mind" and forgot that I was using it in the plural form because of that expression's commonly used singular form.


oh —

nevermind …


Jonny cool.gif


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Joy
post Fri 28th March 2008, 7:02pm
Post #17


I am a millipede! I am amazing!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,820
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 2:25am
From: The Moon
Member No.: 982



A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

At least most Wikipedians don't have to worry about that.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bob Boy
post Fri 28th March 2008, 7:18pm
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue 20th Nov 2007, 3:07pm
Member No.: 3,899



QUOTE(bluevictim @ Fri 28th March 2008, 1:41pm) *

I hope Cla68 doesn't get banned. He and Giano are two of the people I like on there because they are not afraid to speak their mind. I feel glad that someone finally questioned Guy, Slim, and Crum's actions and isn't getting banned for "trolling" and isn't going to let their poor conduct slide. I don't think people should have let this pass by, and thanks to Cla68 who didn't.


Wasn't Cla68 the person who took on Guy in his current RfC?

(checking)

Yes, it was! Go, Cla68!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Count DeMonet
post Fri 28th March 2008, 7:47pm
Post #19


Upper Gallery peanut sniper
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri 7th Mar 2008, 2:59pm
From: Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Member No.: 5,314



Alas poor Cla68, I knew him Horatio....

This dawg ain't gonna hunt.

Slimmy will pull her usual damsal in distress act and scream wiki-stallking from the highest towers (throwing in several veiled allusions to rape). The RFC will go nowhere, the cabalistas (with more socks than you could fit into a Walmart warehouse) will rally the defense, and when the embers die down Slimey will play Shari Lewis and have one of her ...ahem!... cohorts find a jumped up reason to drop the banhammer.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Fri 28th March 2008, 9:01pm
Post #20


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Count DeMonet @ Fri 28th March 2008, 7:47pm) *

Alas poor Cla68, I knew him Horatio....

This dawg ain't gonna hunt.

Slimmy will pull her usual damsal in distress act and scream wiki-stallking from the highest towers (throwing in several veiled allusions to rape). The RFC will go nowhere, the cabalistas (with more socks than you could fit into a Walmart warehouse) will rally the defense, and when the embers die down Slimey will play Shari Lewis and have one of her ...ahem!... cohorts find a jumped up reason to drop the banhammer.

You have to admire the samurai spirit of it, though. Cla68 didn't make it though his last RfA due to somebody (SV, I do believe) suggesting very nastily that he was a sock of Wordbomb or one of Weiss' enemies, or somebody that is officially not liked by the Cabal. That was enough to torpedo it. When later it was more or less proven he wasn't, they suggested that he POSTED HERE on WR (gasp). He denied it, but that's like denying you're a witch. In the end they couldn't make any of it stick, but not before the baseless accusations had acheived their purpose. I don't think he's forgotten it.

BTW, the admin who reminds me most of SV in behavior is not her little Crummy backup tagteam friend, but rather somebody called Brownhairedgirl aka BHG. Same hysteria, same fixation with rape language in any dispute. Same regarding of anybody posting on her TALK page as "stalking" (even though she'll do the pussycat backroll to invite it). A piece of work. But I think she's a UK person, so probably not an SV sock. I'm guessing this is just a "female paranoic WP admin syndrome" = FPWPAS™.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st 5 13, 5:16pm