The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Where oh where, Long see, no time
zvook
post Sun 24th May 2009, 3:37pm
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon 22nd Dec 2008, 3:21am
Member No.: 9,484



QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Sun 24th May 2009, 4:24pm) *

QUOTE(Mathsci @ Sun 24th May 2009, 6:05am) *

QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sun 24th May 2009, 9:29am) *

QUOTE(Mathsci @ Fri 22nd May 2009, 9:40am) *

She has been woken from her deep sleep by KillerChihuahau, a kind fairy who has given her friendly words of advice.


You are not funny. I am not laughing.


Should I care?


Moi? I'm sure laughing. This is Real Contender for the Most Ironic Thing Ever Written On Wikipedia (MITEWOW)

QUOTE

Hi, didn't know if you were aware of this: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ryulong/Proposed decision#Ryulong desysopped. As he is the only Admin besides you I know of who was asked to step down under AOR who did not, perhaps there is a lesson there for you — those who have expressed concern about your methods and actions do so with concern for Wikipedia in mind, and not for any baseless or personal reason. You would do well to heed their advice and pay attention to their concerns, and modify your approach accordingly. Those who cause distress and concern to such a large group of established, reputable editors would do well to examine their own actions, because while the majority is not always right, when there are that many complaints, there are generally grounds for them and eventually this must be corrected, one way or the other. I hope you will consider this a helpful bit of advice, and cease your high-handed, dismissive way of simply ignoring or personalizing concerns brought to you about your actions and instead view the mass of criticism directed your way as an opportunity to improve. KillerChihuahua?!? 18:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


And that is saying a lot —

Ja Ja boing.gif



KC and Elonka both seem to be masters of projection; I wonder if this will kick off a great mirrorinsideamirrorinsideamirrorinsideamirror-type effect.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Sun 24th May 2009, 5:30pm
Post #22


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,738
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(zvook @ Sun 24th May 2009, 11:37am) *

KC and Elonka both seem to be masters of projection; I wonder if this will kick off a great mirrorinsideamirrorinsideamirrorinsideamirror-type effect.


In a glass, that dimly, it takes but a few reflections before everything fades to blecchhh sick.gif

Jon hrmph.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Sun 24th May 2009, 11:26pm
Post #23


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(zvook @ Sun 24th May 2009, 11:37am) *
KC and Elonka both seem to be masters of projection

Yes, but not of editing an "encyclopedia". If this were a real encyclopedia, the editor-in-chief
would have been well within his rights to toss both of them out the door for conflict of interest.
And yet, it does not happen.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ahypori
post Mon 25th May 2009, 2:49am
Post #24


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue 17th Mar 2009, 5:25am
From: Mainland Western U.S.
Member No.: 10,841

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Alison @ Sun 24th May 2009, 1:07am) *

(* only one of which functions at any given time wink.gif )

biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lar
post Mon 25th May 2009, 3:52am
Post #25


"His blandness goes to 11!"
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,116
Joined: Wed 26th Dec 2007, 6:04pm
From: A large LEGO storage facility
Member No.: 4,290



QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Sun 24th May 2009, 3:23am) *

QUOTE(Grep @ Sat 23rd May 2009, 9:42pm) *

Elonka's recall criteria are good for a laugh. Sudoku addicts can work out whether there are any circumstances, likely or unlikely, under which those criteria could actually be met.

I'm no seppuku addict but if I think her criteria are more straightforward than this esoteric nonsense.

More gameable, you mean.

Mine are written so that whoever uses them (including myself, or any other admin that adopts them, and there are quite a few) can't game them.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
CharlotteWebb
post Mon 25th May 2009, 4:21am
Post #26


Postmaster General
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,740
Joined: Mon 18th Jun 2007, 2:09am
Member No.: 1,727

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Lar @ Mon 25th May 2009, 3:52am) *

Mine are written so that whoever uses them (including myself, or any other admin that adopts them, and there are quite a few) can't game them.

Mathematically impossible you mean. But hey it's your story, tell it like you want.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lar
post Mon 25th May 2009, 4:36am
Post #27


"His blandness goes to 11!"
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,116
Joined: Wed 26th Dec 2007, 6:04pm
From: A large LEGO storage facility
Member No.: 4,290



QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Mon 25th May 2009, 12:21am) *

QUOTE(Lar @ Mon 25th May 2009, 3:52am) *

Mine are written so that whoever uses them (including myself, or any other admin that adopts them, and there are quite a few) can't game them.

Mathematically impossible you mean. But hey it's your story, tell it like you want.

Let's (hypothetically) see yours, then. I count quite a few admins in the category that adopted mine as written, or adopted significant portions.

The design goal is to not prevent legitimate grievance from being presented, not make it something that the admin saying they are recallable can get out of, so that it has teeth, and yet prevent trolls who are there just for the LULZ or whatever from being able to waste any significant time.

How would you structure criteria and process to achieve that? You're quick to snipe but can you do better? Be specific.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sbrown
post Mon 25th May 2009, 6:53am
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu 21st May 2009, 9:14am
Member No.: 11,840



You have to take your hat off to lar. Hes very clever in some ways and seems to be a very nice honest individual. Alas he has one blind spot which is of course wikipeida. He must be made to realise that it only keeps going because of people like him and for his own good and that of all the thousands of wikivictims across the globe he should cease and desist.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 5 13, 12:23am