FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
For-profit college, former employee square off in Wikipedia defamation case -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> For-profit college, former employee square off in Wikipedia defamation case, Ars Technica
Newsfeed
post
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined:
Member No.: 2,885



For-profit college, former employee square off in Wikipedia defamation case

Ars Technica
Eric Goldman • Published March 5, 2012 3:45 PM • Given the size and scale of its database, it's remarkable that we don't see more US defamation lawsuits filed (rather than just threatened) over Wikipedia entries. It's even more remarkable when you …
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
thekohser
post
Post #2


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



It's certainly opinionated of the author of that piece, Eric Goldman, to say:
QUOTE
Clearly, these are relatively obscure pages. Any reputational impact of the alleged defamation was surely small.


...when he even calculated that probably hundreds of people viewed the pages while the defamation was in place. There are programs on television at this very moment that only hundreds of people are watching, anywhere in the world. Would such a television program's producers and broadcaster be immune from judgment if they said, "This is a relatively obscure TV show, any reputational impact of the alleged defamation was surely small"?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Detective
post
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 331
Joined:
Member No.: 35,179



QUOTE(thekohser @ Fri 9th March 2012, 1:21pm) *

There are programs on television at this very moment that only hundreds of people are watching, anywhere in the world. Would such a television program's producers and broadcaster be immune from judgment if they said, "This is a relatively obscure TV show, any reputational impact of the alleged defamation was surely small"?

Unquestionably that would be a good argument for saying that any damages awarded should be modest.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)