The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> IRS issues new Form 990
thekohser
post Fri 4th January 2008, 3:59pm
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



The Internal Revenue Service has beefed up its Form 990 (required filing for U.S. non-profits). According to this non-partisan review, the new form addresses "the increased demand for transparency and accountability."

That will be bad news for the notoriously less-than-transparent and legally-unaccountable WMF.

Greg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Samuel Culper Sr.
post Fri 4th January 2008, 4:57pm
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 1:42pm
Member No.: 4,206



Might not mean terribly much to people around here, but that's one of the bad things about Danny leaving.

The one that was actually pushing for transparency/accountability in the high levels leaves. Look at the storm that has followed his departure.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GlassBeadGame
post Fri 4th January 2008, 5:10pm
Post #3


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981



QUOTE(Samuel Culper Sr. @ Fri 4th January 2008, 11:57am) *

Might not mean terribly much to people around here, but that's one of the bad things about Danny leaving.

The one that was actually pushing for transparency/accountability in the high levels leaves. Look at the storm that has followed his departure.


I would rather the IRS insist on transparency than Danny talk about it. Also Danny stood for RfA (reconfirmation) on a platform of "oh if you knew what I know" indicating he was saving more disclosures for Board of Trustee run, which ultimately failed. Funny kind of transparency.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KStreetSlave
post Sat 5th January 2008, 7:41am
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 352
Joined: Tue 11th Dec 2007, 6:33pm
Member No.: 4,123



QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Fri 4th January 2008, 12:10pm) *

QUOTE(Samuel Culper Sr. @ Fri 4th January 2008, 11:57am) *

Might not mean terribly much to people around here, but that's one of the bad things about Danny leaving.

The one that was actually pushing for transparency/accountability in the high levels leaves. Look at the storm that has followed his departure.


I would rather the IRS insist on transparency than Danny talk about it. Also Danny stood for RfA (reconfirmation) on a platform of "oh if you knew what I know" indicating he was saving more disclosures for Board of Trustee run, which ultimately failed. Funny kind of transparency.


Danny's board run failed because he went public with dirty laundry about Oscar and Florence, that they didn't want public, so they said "oh how dare you slander me". Keep in mind that Danny probably had to sign an NDA when he left so he can't disclose much (Carolyn did, anyway).

Danny filed the grant requests. He did the audits. He tracked the finances. And in his own words, when he left, none of that stuff got touched, and is still sitting there. I've seen him say multiple times in multiple venues that "If you look in such and such a place in the office you'll see my files on blah blah blah". Said files are still sitting there, untouched by everyone else since then.

Danny is a disagreeable person when he doesn't like something. So, not too different than the current board. We should convince him to run again and push to elect him: then we'll have an experienced board member, who already knows the system and to some extent the community, who is FOR transparency.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd 5 13, 7:39pm