The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article CandidatesFeatured Article ReviewArticles for DeletionDeletion Review

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 2008 United States general election, or, if Wikipedia had been around, Bush would've won Florida withou
Sceptre
post Thu 6th November 2008, 7:09pm
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed 24th May 2006, 6:06pm
Member No.: 209

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



What an unmitigated disaster.

Really.

The article is really sensitive. As we learned in 2000, you don't call states until you're absolutely sure they've been won.

So why does the article say that Obama's definitively got 364 electoral votes? Last time I checked, North Carolina wasn't projected by anyone. 0.2% is enough for a mandatory recount in states that require one (I think North Carolina is one). The same goes to Missouri and Nebraska-2. Especially Nebraska-2. 600 votes isn't enough to call a state on.

Guess Minnesota need not proceed with their recount; Senator Coleman has retained his seat by this standard.

Edit: About 15 minutes ago, North Carolina got called by FOX, NBC, and AP. Now I know how the newsanchors back in 2000 felt like.

This post has been edited by Sceptre: Thu 6th November 2008, 7:30pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
One
post Thu 6th November 2008, 7:44pm
Post #2


Postmaster General
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,553
Joined: Tue 25th Dec 2007, 10:49am
Member No.: 4,284

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Sceptre @ Thu 6th November 2008, 7:09pm) *

What an unmitigated disaster.

Really.

The article is really sensitive. As we learned in 2000, you don't call states until you're absolutely sure they've been won.

So why does the article say that Obama's definitively got 364 electoral votes? Last time I checked, North Carolina wasn't projected by anyone. 0.2% is enough for a mandatory recount in states that require one (I think North Carolina is one). The same goes to Missouri and Nebraska-2. Especially Nebraska-2. 600 votes isn't enough to call a state on.

Guess Minnesota need not proceed with their recount; Senator Coleman has retained his seat by this standard.

Edit: About 15 minutes ago, North Carolina got called by FOX, NBC, and AP. Now I know how the newsanchors back in 2000 felt like.

You got bets on Intrade or something?

In 2000 it mattered because the states were called before Western states even closed the polls. I'm not sure how it matters days later, especially when McCain himself conceded, what, 40 hours ago.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sceptre
post Thu 6th November 2008, 8:05pm
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed 24th May 2006, 6:06pm
Member No.: 209

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(One @ Thu 6th November 2008, 7:44pm) *

QUOTE(Sceptre @ Thu 6th November 2008, 7:09pm) *

What an unmitigated disaster.

Really.

The article is really sensitive. As we learned in 2000, you don't call states until you're absolutely sure they've been won.

So why does the article say that Obama's definitively got 364 electoral votes? Last time I checked, North Carolina wasn't projected by anyone. 0.2% is enough for a mandatory recount in states that require one (I think North Carolina is one). The same goes to Missouri and Nebraska-2. Especially Nebraska-2. 600 votes isn't enough to call a state on.

Guess Minnesota need not proceed with their recount; Senator Coleman has retained his seat by this standard.

Edit: About 15 minutes ago, North Carolina got called by FOX, NBC, and AP. Now I know how the newsanchors back in 2000 felt like.

You got bets on Intrade or something?

In 2000 it mattered because the states were called before Western states even closed the polls. I'm not sure how it matters days later, especially when McCain himself conceded, what, 40 hours ago.


I'm talking more from a credibility standpoint (yes, I know that multiplying something by zero will get you zero, but still). 2000 served as a warning to check and triple-check before calling states.

And McCain conceded before the polls closed in Alaska, didn't he?

In any case, Wikipedia, if it still exists in 2012, will need a system for calling states that doesn't rely on just one organisation. Maybe use the BBC standard (ABC, or one network and AP) or wait until three orgs independently call a state. (And yes, I know that all the networks called Florida for Gore before the Panhandle closed its polls)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KamrynMatika
post Thu 6th November 2008, 9:12pm
Post #4


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 625
Joined: Sun 24th Jun 2007, 1:59am
Member No.: 1,776



QUOTE(Sceptre @ Thu 6th November 2008, 8:05pm) *

And McCain conceded before the polls closed in Alaska, didn't he?


Everyone knew Alaska was going to go to McCain... whether he got it or not was immaterial at that point.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sceptre
post Thu 6th November 2008, 9:35pm
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed 24th May 2006, 6:06pm
Member No.: 209

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(KamrynMatika @ Thu 6th November 2008, 9:12pm) *

QUOTE(Sceptre @ Thu 6th November 2008, 8:05pm) *

And McCain conceded before the polls closed in Alaska, didn't he?


Everyone knew Alaska was going to go to McCain... whether he got it or not was immaterial at that point.


Let me take another example: Nevada. Swing state. IIRC, it closed its polls at 10pm eastern, by which time Obama was expected to take the presidency.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
One
post Thu 6th November 2008, 9:40pm
Post #6


Postmaster General
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,553
Joined: Tue 25th Dec 2007, 10:49am
Member No.: 4,284

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Sceptre @ Thu 6th November 2008, 9:35pm) *

Let me take another example: Nevada. Swing state. IIRC, it closed its polls at 10pm eastern, by which time Obama was expected to take the presidency.

I agree in principle.

For example, if McCain had been closer overall, and Pennsylvania really had been too close to call, it would make a huge difference in subsequent states if it was incorrectly called one way or the other.

In this case, he just lost lost, but in the future it could be a problem.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirFozzie
post Thu 6th November 2008, 10:17pm
Post #7


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 806
Joined: Thu 29th Mar 2007, 3:32pm
Member No.: 1,200

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Actually, AP and others called North Carolina for Obama about 2 PM today, I remember hearing it on my way in to work
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Floydsvoid
post Thu 6th November 2008, 11:00pm
Post #8


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed 19th Dec 2007, 1:32am
Member No.: 4,216



QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Thu 6th November 2008, 6:17pm) *

Actually, AP and others called North Carolina for Obama about 2 PM today, I remember hearing it on my way in to work

I'm glad they made the call; otherwise the state was going to have to go through the time and expense of validating 40000 provisional ballots for not a whole lot of reason.

I might not remember what I had for dinner last night but it seems to me it's a fairly recent thing that mainstream media has lightened up on its projections. It seems to me that MSM is doing this voluntarily and it also seems to me that I would not trust the numbers on Wikipedia even if I was deranged enough to go there looking for them.

Having the projections going on throughout the day never swayed me from going to the polls.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sceptre
post Fri 7th November 2008, 1:17pm
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed 24th May 2006, 6:06pm
Member No.: 209

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(One @ Thu 6th November 2008, 9:40pm) *

QUOTE(Sceptre @ Thu 6th November 2008, 9:35pm) *

Let me take another example: Nevada. Swing state. IIRC, it closed its polls at 10pm eastern, by which time Obama was expected to take the presidency.

I agree in principle.

For example, if McCain had been closer overall, and Pennsylvania really had been too close to call, it would make a huge difference in subsequent states if it was incorrectly called one way or the other.

In this case, he just lost lost, but in the future it could be a problem.


Florida 2000 again being an example; the networks called it for Gore while the panhandle was still voting. That dissuaded some voters there from voting and made the race tighter.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sceptre
post Fri 7th November 2008, 1:27pm
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed 24th May 2006, 6:06pm
Member No.: 209

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Floydsvoid @ Thu 6th November 2008, 11:00pm) *

QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Thu 6th November 2008, 6:17pm) *

Actually, AP and others called North Carolina for Obama about 2 PM today, I remember hearing it on my way in to work

I'm glad they made the call; otherwise the state was going to have to go through the time and expense of validating 40000 provisional ballots for not a whole lot of reason.

I might not remember what I had for dinner last night but it seems to me it's a fairly recent thing that mainstream media has lightened up on its projections. It seems to me that MSM is doing this voluntarily and it also seems to me that I would not trust the numbers on Wikipedia even if I was deranged enough to go there looking for them.

Having the projections going on throughout the day never swayed me from going to the polls.


Intelligence obeys Sturgeon's Law (which I always thought was too optimistic); why else do you think shows like Big Brother and Jerry Springer are popular? tongue.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Random832
post Fri 7th November 2008, 3:30pm
Post #11


meh
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,933
Joined: Thu 14th Feb 2008, 8:52pm
Member No.: 4,844

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Floydsvoid @ Thu 6th November 2008, 11:00pm) *

QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Thu 6th November 2008, 6:17pm) *

Actually, AP and others called North Carolina for Obama about 2 PM today, I remember hearing it on my way in to work

I'm glad they made the call; otherwise the state was going to have to go through the time and expense of validating 40000 provisional ballots for not a whole lot of reason.


I'm pretty sure it's the election board, not the news media, that determine whether the provisional ballots will have to be counted.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Son of a Yeti
post Fri 7th November 2008, 5:23pm
Post #12


High altitude member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 415
Joined: Sun 26th Oct 2008, 3:30pm
From: A hiding place in the Himalaya
Member No.: 8,704



QUOTE(Random832 @ Fri 7th November 2008, 8:30am) *

I'm pretty sure it's the election board, not the news media, that determine whether the provisional ballots will have to be counted.


Which is unjust!

It should be the job Wikipedia to declare who won where.

Of course by consensus of the community Arbcom decision.

wink.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Sat 8th November 2008, 5:04am
Post #13


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Sceptre @ Thu 6th November 2008, 2:35pm) *

QUOTE(KamrynMatika @ Thu 6th November 2008, 9:12pm) *

QUOTE(Sceptre @ Thu 6th November 2008, 8:05pm) *

And McCain conceded before the polls closed in Alaska, didn't he?


Everyone knew Alaska was going to go to McCain... whether he got it or not was immaterial at that point.


Let me take another example: Nevada. Swing state. IIRC, it closed its polls at 10pm eastern, by which time Obama was expected to take the presidency.

But at least the networks were careful not to make any kind of official prediction until 11:01 EST, which was a minute past poll closing time anywhere in the continental US.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Heat
post Sun 9th November 2008, 4:33am
Post #14


Tenured
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 726
Joined: Mon 5th Mar 2007, 2:46am
Member No.: 1,066



QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Sat 8th November 2008, 5:04am) *

QUOTE(Sceptre @ Thu 6th November 2008, 2:35pm) *

QUOTE(KamrynMatika @ Thu 6th November 2008, 9:12pm) *

QUOTE(Sceptre @ Thu 6th November 2008, 8:05pm) *

And McCain conceded before the polls closed in Alaska, didn't he?


Everyone knew Alaska was going to go to McCain... whether he got it or not was immaterial at that point.


Let me take another example: Nevada. Swing state. IIRC, it closed its polls at 10pm eastern, by which time Obama was expected to take the presidency.

But at least the networks were careful not to make any kind of official prediction until 11:01 EST, which was a minute past poll closing time anywhere in the continental US.


I think Fox might have predicted it earlier but no one paid attention laugh.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st 5 13, 8:58pm