The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Where is the best place on the Wikipedia to raise ethical issues or admin abuse?
Rating  3
Cock-up-over-conspiracy
post Sun 7th December 2008, 3:15am
Post #1


Now censored by flckr.com and who else ... ???
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,693
Joined: Sat 6th Dec 2008, 6:08am
Member No.: 9,267



One question please,
  • where is the best place on the Wikipedia to raise ethical issues about an admin's background and behavior or admin abuse?
Its interesting. I have been probing this one a little bit.

It strikes me that far worse that being an absolute POV loon gaming the wiki, a trivia buff filling it with crufts, or even a puppeteer of 10,000 disguises ... attempting to seriously question, or demonstrate systemic failures within the Wikipedia, or the background, behavior and actions of the chosen few, is dealt with far more quickly and severely. Especially if it is stating the evident and obvious!

Please excuse me if I am new to all this discussion, state the obvious or this has already been covered.

It seems to be that there is no specific page to address admin or bureaucrat abuse.

Where is the best page to place a critique so that it is seen my the most and most influential individuals?

Interestingly, I have discovered that placing well presented pieces on the Jimbo Wales talk page will not only lead to them being deleted ... but even erased from its history as if it was never made.

Excuse my naivety, but it is also obvious that little cliques of admins are looking after each other even though their actions are plainly contrary to the most basic editorial policies.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post Sun 7th December 2008, 3:19am
Post #2


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Sat 6th December 2008, 9:15pm) *
where is the best place on the Wikipedia to raise ethical issues about an admin's background and behavior or admin abuse?
Probably here on Wikipedia Review. Attempting to raise such issues on Wikipedia proper is likely to get you banned in short order.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tarantino
post Sun 7th December 2008, 3:32am
Post #3


the Dude abides
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,439
Joined: Mon 30th Jul 2007, 11:41pm
Member No.: 2,143



Welcome CUOC. I'll second Kelly.

If you have no power on Wikipedia, you're more likely to get a positive response after posting a legitimate complaint here. Most everybody of influence on Wikipedia either participates, reads or has provocative Wikipedia Review threads reported to them.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cedric
post Sun 7th December 2008, 7:12am
Post #4


General Gato
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,648
Joined: Sun 11th Mar 2007, 5:58pm
From: God's Ain Country
Member No.: 1,116

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Sat 6th December 2008, 9:15pm) *

Where is the best page to place a critique so that it is seen my the most and most influential individuals?

Interestingly, I have discovered that placing well presented pieces on the Jimbo Wales talk page will not only lead to them being deleted ... but even erased from its history as if it was never made.

Excuse my naivety, but it is also obvious that little cliques of admins are looking after each other even though their actions are plainly contrary to the most basic editorial policies.

Once upon a time, I was invited to give comment on Jimbo's talk page, an invitation which I declined because by that time I finally realized the futility thereof. Instead, I promptly buggered off Wikipedia, which, for me at least, was the only mentally healthy response left.

Welcome, Cock-up-over-conspiracy, to Wikipedia Review.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eppur si muove
post Sun 7th December 2008, 12:57pm
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri 28th Nov 2008, 10:50pm
Member No.: 9,171



QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Sun 7th December 2008, 3:15am) *

One question please,
  • where is the best place on the Wikipedia to raise ethical issues about an admin's background and behavior or admin abuse?
Its interesting. I have been probing this one a little bit.

It strikes me that far worse that being an absolute POV loon gaming the wiki, a trivia buff filling it with crufts, or even a puppeteer of 10,000 disguises ... attempting to seriously question, or demonstrate systemic failures within the Wikipedia, or the background, behavior and actions of the chosen few, is dealt with far more quickly and severely. Especially if it is stating the evident and obvious!

Please excuse me if I am new to all this discussion, state the obvious or this has already been covered.

It seems to be that there is no specific page to address admin or bureaucrat abuse.

Where is the best page to place a critique so that it is seen my the most and most influential individuals?

Interestingly, I have discovered that placing well presented pieces on the Jimbo Wales talk page will not only lead to them being deleted ... but even erased from its history as if it was never made.

Excuse my naivety, but it is also obvious that little cliques of admins are looking after each other even though their actions are plainly contrary to the most basic editorial policies.


Please tell me that this isn't about Gwen Gale.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Herschelkrustofsky
post Sun 7th December 2008, 1:07pm
Post #6


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sat 6th December 2008, 7:19pm) *

QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Sat 6th December 2008, 9:15pm) *
where is the best place on the Wikipedia to raise ethical issues about an admin's background and behavior or admin abuse?
Probably here on Wikipedia Review. Attempting to raise such issues on Wikipedia proper is likely to get you banned in short order.
Well put. If you want to call your opinion to the attention of influentials, you may use the Aministrators' Noticeboard, where it will be treated as an urgent request to be banned.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Sun 7th December 2008, 1:21pm
Post #7


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



According to an expert on this question, the best place to put a complaint about the profound lack of professional ethics on Wikipedia is on the Op-Ed page of USA Today.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Mon 8th December 2008, 3:27am
Post #8


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Don't forget to send your evidence to Cade Metz at the Register.....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
quanta
post Thu 2nd April 2009, 6:39am
Post #9


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri 27th Mar 2009, 12:21pm
Member No.: 10,988



QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 8th December 2008, 8:27am) *

Don't forget to send your evidence to Cade Metz at the Register.....

It depends if your a admin or a offical then your point will be heard otherwise just keep silent
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Son of a Yeti
post Thu 2nd April 2009, 7:02am
Post #10


High altitude member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 415
Joined: Sun 26th Oct 2008, 3:30pm
From: A hiding place in the Himalaya
Member No.: 8,704



QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sat 6th December 2008, 8:19pm) *

QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Sat 6th December 2008, 9:15pm) *
where is the best place on the Wikipedia to raise ethical issues about an admin's background and behavior or admin abuse?
Probably here on Wikipedia Review. Attempting to raise such issues on Wikipedia proper is likely to get you banned in short order.


I second this. Actually I wanted to give the same reply when I saw the thread title.

Nowadays it's dangerous even to comment on AN/I if you are a mere mortal.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
quanta
post Thu 2nd April 2009, 7:31am
Post #11


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri 27th Mar 2009, 12:21pm
Member No.: 10,988



QUOTE(Son of a Yeti @ Thu 2nd April 2009, 12:02pm) *

QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sat 6th December 2008, 8:19pm) *

QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Sat 6th December 2008, 9:15pm) *
where is the best place on the Wikipedia to raise ethical issues about an admin's background and behavior or admin abuse?
Probably here on Wikipedia Review. Attempting to raise such issues on Wikipedia proper is likely to get you banned in short order.


I second this. Actually I wanted to give the same reply when I saw the thread title.

Nowadays it's dangerous even to comment on AN/I if you are a mere mortal.

You will get blocked just for reporting

This post has been edited by quanta: Thu 2nd April 2009, 7:32am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Emperor
post Thu 2nd April 2009, 2:35pm
Post #12


Try spam today!
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,833
Joined: Sat 21st Jul 2007, 4:09pm
Member No.: 2,042



Go to other websites. If it's really important to you, there are plenty of places you can post your information.

Spend an hour posting it everywhere you can think, rather than 10 hours bellyaching on Wikipedia.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st 5 13, 10:06am