 Carhartt |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  |
| thekohser |
 Mon 23rd January 2012, 6:26pm
Post
#1
|
|
Member  Group: Regulars Posts: 10,274 Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm Member No.: 911  |
Thanks to one editor in 2008 using zero sources, the Carhartt company is now firmly associated across the web with the phrase: "they run their operations like they were non-unionized plants".
I have no stake in this issue, but it certainly seems to me that this sort of thing going unsourced for over three years is not showcasing the pride of Wikipedia. |
   |
 
|
| Michaeldsuarez |
Mon 23rd January 2012, 6:43pm
Post
#2
|
 Über Member Group: Contributors Posts: 557 Joined: Mon 9th Aug 2010, 7:51pm From: New York, New York Member No.: 24,428 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
QUOTE(thekohser @ Mon 23rd January 2012, 1:26pm)  Thanks to one editor in 2008 using zero sources, the Carhartt company is now firmly associated across the web with the phrase: "they run their operations like they were non-unionized plants". I have no stake in this issue, but it certainly seems to me that this sort of thing going unsourced for over three years is not showcasing the pride of Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=448155432 And no one cares to remove unsourced (Is that a word? I guess that with Wikipedia, the creation of such a word was deemed necessary) material from the article; they simply tag it and leave it to rot. Also take a look at the following discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...nt_corporations Living persons could protect themselves from unsourced statements in their Wikipedia biographies, but businesses can't. This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez: Mon 23rd January 2012, 6:46pm |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th 6 13, 5:25am |