FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
What will kill Citizendium? -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> What will kill Citizendium?
Rating  5
Nicholas Carr
post
Post #1


RSS Feed Reader
***

Group: Bots
Posts: 153
Joined:
Member No.: 96



Wikipedia is nothing if not a forum for interminable pissing matches, ... Wikipedia today has more layers of bureaucracy than the average Fortune 500 company and ... What "will kill Citizendium," he writes, is that, unlike Wikipedia, ...

http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2006/09/...xpertfocuse.php
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Grep
post
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 269
Joined:
Member No.: 8,638



Is there any legal/licence reason why Citizendium experts should not simply transfer articles from Wikipedia that actually happen to be well-written and accurate?

This post has been edited by Grep:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post
Post #3


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066



QUOTE(Grep @ Wed 29th July 2009, 11:10pm) *

Is there any legal/licence reason why Citizendium experts should not simply transfer articles from Wikipedia that actually happen to be well-written and accurate?

Not a damn thing, as long as they conform to the GPL or CC license for a given article and any images associated. (You also notice the near-total lack of images on Citizendium. They could go to Flickr or somewhere else and find CC licensed or PD images.)

In fact, that would be the smart thing to do.

I would not be surprised to learn that Sanger is discouraging WP reuse, despite it being an easy way to get material for review and eventual publication. Perhaps because he hates being reminded of WP's greater success? Embarrassing?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cla68
post
Post #4


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,763
Joined:
Member No.: 5,761



QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Sun 2nd August 2009, 11:31pm) *

QUOTE(Grep @ Wed 29th July 2009, 11:10pm) *

Is there any legal/licence reason why Citizendium experts should not simply transfer articles from Wikipedia that actually happen to be well-written and accurate?

Not a damn thing, as long as they conform to the GPL or CC license for a given article and any images associated. (You also notice the near-total lack of images on Citizendium. They could go to Flickr or somewhere else and find CC licensed or PD images.)

In fact, that would be the smart thing to do.

I would not be surprised to learn that Sanger is discouraging WP reuse, despite it being an easy way to get material for review and eventual publication. Perhaps because he hates being reminded of WP's greater success? Embarrassing?


Some time ago the Citizendium regulars had a vote and decided not to allow copies of Wikipedia articles. I'm still on the Citizendium mailing list so I remember reading about it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)