Ryulong might be going to arbitration Options

[LamontStormstar]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...tration#Ryulong

Ryulong might be going to arbitration

[LaraLove]

Here's the quotation from Raul654:

I have promoted Ryulong to sysop. While some might object that he was below 70% support (with 69.4%), I believe, based on my interactions with him, that he would make a good sysop, and it would be a mistake not to promote him. Raul654 06:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Hilarity ensues. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_tal...t_69.4.25.21.3F

What a perfect example of Raul's arrogant, corrupt and power-mongering personality.

Can we get an RFAR against him for once?

Well-deserved, but pointless. It would go nowhere. He holds way too much power and ArbCom wouldn't do jack to him. That's why you haven't seen a case against him.

Perhaps because no one has bothered to. If people got up of their arse to make a case instead of coming here to spend their lives whining about how x admin is a bitch and ruined my life etc etc then we'd get a lot more done.

I missed this until today, when it was bumped by the new posts.

I was retired when this post was made, but even out of retirement, I'm bright enough to know Raul is an untouchable. As those here and elsewhere so often suggest, and is mentioned in this very thread by Greg, there are better things to spend one's time on, like a girlfriend (or, in my case, a boyfriend), and I'm in school now too. Studying > Wikipedia.

Anyone who goes after Raul is wasting their time, but they'd get my full support regardless.

[victim of censorship]

Here's the quotation from Raul654:

I have promoted Ryulong to sysop. While some might object that he was below 70% support (with 69.4%), I believe, based on my interactions with him, that he would make a good sysop, and it would be a mistake not to promote him. Raul654 06:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Hilarity ensues. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_tal...t_69.4.25.21.3F

What a perfect example of Raul's arrogant, corrupt and power-mongering personality.

Can we get an RFAR against him for once?

Well-deserved, but pointless. It would go nowhere. He holds way too much power and ArbCom wouldn't do jack to him. That's why you haven't seen a case against him.

Perhaps because no one has bothered to. If people got up of their arse to make a case instead of coming here to spend their lives whining about how x admin is a bitch and ruined my life etc etc then we'd get a lot more done.

I missed this until today, when it was bumped by the new posts.

I was retired when this post was made, but even out of retirement, I'm bright enough to know Raul is an untouchable. As those here and elsewhere so often suggest, and is mentioned in this very thread by Greg, there are better things to spend one's time on, like a girlfriend (or, in my case, a boyfriend), and I'm in school now too. Studying > Wikipedia.

Anyone who goes after Raul is wasting their time, but they'd get my full support regardless.

Raul should be thrown in jail

[LaraLove]

Raul should be thrown in jail

For what crime, exactly?

[Moulton]

What goes around comes around.

Raul should be thrown in jail.

For what crime, exactly?

For throwing others in jail.

It's the name of the game on WP.

[Apathetic]

Raul should be thrown in jail.

For what crime, exactly?

Crimes Against Featured Articles: Discrimination against Jenna Jameson! (but Gropecunt Lane is just fine, oHH k!)

This post has been edited by Apathetic: