QUOTE(ColScott @ Sun 6th December 2009, 6:43pm)
There is no way forward. The only solution is to shut it down and scatter it to the four winds. The idea that experts don't matter but 12 year old Canadians in their basements do is beyond untenable. There is no fixing something that is one hundred percent fucked from the head on down. What gives any anonymous douchebag the qualifications to write about ME and then call it encyclopedic? The project has failed from the top down. There is no fixing. Even smart guys like Doc are saying things that are NOT WORTH DOING.
AMEN BRO... Sing it loud. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/applause.gif) (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
As i have said many times...
After all that has been said this is the general consensus of WR
and those out side Wikipedia:
1. Wikipedia has no governance to speak of. Its a land of Jungle law.
2. Wikipedia has no respect for people and their works. People are treated on Wikipedia like shit.
3. Wikipedia can not be trusted for accurate information considering the agenda pushing street gangs of wiki.
4. Wikipedia pollutes the internet as well as diminishes scholarship. It floods and pollutes the search engines on the internet and pushes out good scholarship and honest debate in favor of bad scholarship, defamation and bold face intimation and thuggery.
5. Wikipedia needs to be bought under the rules of slander, liable, defamation, and copyright laws.
6. Wikipedia should be stripped of its 501c3 status.
Wikipedia is out of control wild west with out rules, ethics or accountability.
It would be a favor to the body politic to sell the wikipedia domain to more responsible parties (Britannia etc), and purge the servers and sell them to the highest bidder and use the money to feed African children.