The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Jimbo invites even more users to censor his talk
mbz1
post Thu 15th December 2011, 3:19pm
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 10:50pm
Member No.: 25,791



"removing Fram's personal attacks not grounded in fact, and request others do the same if he posts them again"

BTW what was PA, this one? confused.gif
QUOTE
I am discussing his actions as "governor" here, and his role here (and on related projects like Commons), as e.g. described in [[WP:AP]]. [[Dictator]]: "In modern usage, the term "dictator" is generally used to describe a leader who holds and/or abuses an extraordinary amount of personal power, especially the power to make laws without effective restraint by a legislative assembly". He has the power and right to undo admin and arbcom actions, to wheel war, to ignore policies, and so on. Please indicate which other term I should have used instead of "benevolent dictator" to describe this.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eppur si muove
post Thu 15th December 2011, 3:53pm
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 304
Joined: Fri 28th Nov 2008, 10:50pm
Member No.: 9,171



Personally, I think that this deserves censoring much more simply to protect readers who have not been forewarned from vomiting at the sheer grossness of the act of arse-licking that it portrays.

QUOTE
:::::::::As a general comment, I do not think a Wikipedia, without its Founder, would be anything like it is now and would eventually fail. It is his brainchild and his innovation and he is an integral part of its preservation. I am not well-versed in the bureaucracy of Wikipedia but I will say that all organizations, corporations, institutions that live and breathe undergo changes as need may dictate. In addition, I and many others have noticed a particular mean-spiritness from within Wikipedia toward him in particular and the project in general. I do not know if this is some power-struggle or just editors that like the looks of their words in print expressing no core beliefs (as I said before), and the worst offenders are SPA's created, it seems, only to offend yet wanting to be anonymous and continue to edit under another username. ''I want to stress that these comments do not apply to Fram obviously'' but to many others. If Mr. Wales changes a rule or on rare occasion countermands a decision or unbans an editor due to a extenuating circumstance while trying to maintain the credibility of Wikipedia in a changing negative atmosphere or a particular situation that, it seems to me, it is his right. I have not seen any real evidence of abuse by him but I have by others. I believe I know some of them though they hide behind a temporary IP and they are, for the most part, troublemakers. If they made any of the same kind and tone of statements on an article talk page to an editor they would be immediately blocked by an administrator and for good reason. If I have explained this badly I think most editors understand the gist. [[User:Mugginsx|Mugginsx]] ([[User talk:Mugginsx|talk]]) 15:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Thu 15th December 2011, 9:43pm
Post #3


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(mbz1 @ Thu 15th December 2011, 10:19am) *


This isn't the first time Jimbo has had to deal with Fram's lunacy.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Thu 15th December 2011, 10:28pm
Post #4


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Thu 15th December 2011, 3:53pm) *

Personally, I think that this deserves censoring much more simply to protect readers who have not been forewarned from vomiting at the sheer grossness of the act of arse-licking that it portrays.


I assumed it was an act of parody and we English support it.


QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 15th December 2011, 9:43pm) *

This isn't the first time Jimbo has had to deal with Fram's lunacy.


This cannot have been an act of parody. We English do not support it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st 9 17, 4:56am