Since this post has been linked to a few places, I wanted to clarify a few things, on other people who were banned for posting here. I will start with the first that I know of, and work my way through.
Selina (Mistress Selina Kyle) - had been blocked 3 times prior to first using WR, all 3 were unfair, and was threatened with indef blocks. Posted here to complain about the unfair treatment, and got a 1 month block. Technically indef blocked for using an un-proven sock puppet account while blocked. Realistically, banned for using Wikipedia Review.
Blu Aardvark - was blocked for a week for some ridiculous reason, and during that week vandalised several Wikimedia projects, launched personal attacks galore and used dozens of sock puppets. For that stint used to protest the unfair 1 week block, he was banned indef. Realistically, banned for using Wikipedia Review.
Myself (Zordrac) - was my 2nd account (after Internodeuser) but not a sock puppet (i.e. was not used at the same time, they were fully 6 months apart, and was not used to evade the unfair 1 year block on internodeuser, which was for trying to present accurate information). Ambi threatened to ban me because I was pointing out corruption by Kelly Martin and Slim Virgin, in a precursor to the userbox dispute. The ban was indef but reduced to 3 days after protest by 100 or so admins that I was a good user with a long productive edit history (only one wanting the block was Ambi). This was changed after they did an internet search for Blissyu2 and found a post with me saying "I have used blissyu2, zordrac..." Since so few people (4 I think) have ever used zordrac, and not many have ever used blissyu2 I was banned for that. Basically, because I used this forum.
Vulturell was a good user on Wikipedia with an excellent track record, who was one of many who disagreed with the manner of Slim Virgin, Grace Note and Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters' editing on List of British Jews. He then posted here to talk about how awful it was. As a direct result, he was given an indefinite ban.
Herschellekrutofsky was the subject of an Arbitration ruling saying that he could not edit any LaRouche-related articles. He was not a banned user. As a direct resulting of posting here, the Arb Com case was altered to say that he would be banned for 1 year, even though he had done nothing on-wiki to breach the ban. He did however protest the ruling on Wikipedia Review.
...
I will also elaborate on the 2 admins that were desysopped...
Karmafist was posting here in support of Wikipedia Review when he was added to an Arbitration case involving the userbox wheel war. In spite of it being started by Kelly Martin, Snowspinner and Tony Sidaway, none of them had Arb Com cases against them, yet Karmafist did. Karmafist was one of 3 people desysopped over the subsequent "wheel war", and was the only one who, when he reapplied, did not succeed. The primary reason for "Oppose" votes was a link to a Wikipedia Review post where he criticised Wikipedia. In other words, he was banned for posting on WR.
Guanaco had an Arb Com case against him, and he talked about it on Wikipedia Review. As a direct result of him discussing it here, he was desysopped.
...
There are other cases, which I can pick up later. Please let me know if you think that any of what I said here is misleading or inaccurate, or if you can be bothered providing diffs for this. Unfortunately, some of the bans on WR posters happened because of old forum posts, and hence we can no longer provide evidence for them, other than people's memories of incidents.
|