Who is Cbrick77 (aka "Chris)?, Newbie joins the planning committee for Cirt/Jayen carnival Options

[Jagärdu]

Who is Cbrick77 (aka "Chris") and why is this newbie so interested in creating workshop proposals at the arbitration case between Cirt and Jayen? It certainly has Jayen perplexed and I can't imagine anyone is convinced by the protestations that this is his first account. So who the hell is he? A returned former admin or Arb who left the project with his tails between his legs? Another manifestation of ChrisO -- which would be funny for a number of reasons. Imagine ChrisO thinking to himself that signing his name "Chris" is like hiding in plain sight and therefore a wonderful disguise. I know there are people here who want to play this guessing game so let's hear it.

[Hipocrite]

John254/Kristen Eriksen?

[Jagärdu]

John254/Kristen Eriksen?

And according to MuZemike Hipocrite lost the game. Any other suggestions? Though before moving on did CU results show that all other known John254 socks were "related" or did some come out "unrelated" but quacking so loud that it couldn't be anything else? I see a fair number of "suspected socks" as well. I can't imagine that this is anything but John, or at least someone clever enough to mimic some of his past behavior on purpose.

This post has been edited by Jagärdu:

[No one of consequence]

Any other suggestions? Though before moving on did CU results show that all other known John254 socks were "related" or did some come out "unrelated" but quacking so loud that it couldn't be anything else? I see a fair number of "suspected socks" as well. I can't imagine that this is anything but John, or at least someone clever enough to mimic some of his past behavior on purpose.

What I would really like to see is Hersfold being bold and removing Chris' workshop simply because it is not reasonable for any of the things he might be (honest newbie, good hand/bad hand, or reincarnation) to get involved in an Arbitration process in which he has no history editing the topic area under consideration and no history with the parties.

Certain arbitration cases used to attract lots of comment from a small handful of busybodies who had little at stake but felt the WP world was desperately in need of their wisdom, and cases were the worse for it. I think most of them have found other entertainments.

Courts have discretion to accept or ignore Amicus briefs, and generally do not accept them from people who have no demonstrable interest in the case other than wanting to be a busybody. Arbcom has no history of such a policy but they ought to seriously think about adopting it.

Whoever Cbrick77 is, he is not a credible participant, and his comments ought to be removed. Of course, there is no procedure, policy or rule for this, and a clerk who did it on his own would probably take it up the bum from at least one Arbitrator. Which is too bad.

This post has been edited by No one of consequence:

[Mathsci]

Any other suggestions? Though before moving on did CU results show that all other known John254 socks were "related" or did some come out "unrelated" but quacking so loud that it couldn't be anything else? I see a fair number of "suspected socks" as well. I can't imagine that this is anything but John, or at least someone clever enough to mimic some of his past behavior on purpose.

What I would really like to see is Hersfold being bold and removing Chris' workshop simply because it is not reasonable for any of the things he might be (honest newbie, good hand/bad hand, or reincarnation) to get involved in an Arbitration process in which he has no history editing the topic area under consideration and no history with the parties.

Certain arbitration cases used to attract lots of comment from a small handful of busybodies who had little at stake but felt the WP world was desperately in need of their wisdom, and cases were the worse for it. I think most of them have found other entertainments.

Courts have discretion to accept or ignore Amicus briefs, and generally do not accept them from people who have no demonstrable interest in the case other than wanting to be a busybody. Arbcom has no history of such a policy but they ought to seriously think about adopting it.

Whoever Cbrick77 is, he is not a credible participant, and his comments ought to be removed. Of course, there is no procedure, policy or rule for this, and a clerk who did it on his own would probably take it up the bum from at least one Arbitrator. Which is too bad.

Hersfold has already removed part of Cla68's evidence that attempted to enlarge the scope of the Cirt-Jayen case.

Cbrick77 has told Off2riorob that he wishes to stay out of ArbCom related matters.

Apology

If that is indeed the case, perhaps an elder statesman like Thatcher can suggest as a follow-up that Cbrick77 could request that his evidence and workshop proposals be removed by a clerk.

This post has been edited by Mathsci:

[Jagärdu]

Any other suggestions? Though before moving on did CU results show that all other known John254 socks were "related" or did some come out "unrelated" but quacking so loud that it couldn't be anything else? I see a fair number of "suspected socks" as well. I can't imagine that this is anything but John, or at least someone clever enough to mimic some of his past behavior on purpose.

What I would really like to see is Hersfold being bold and removing Chris' workshop simply because it is not reasonable for any of the things he might be (honest newbie, good hand/bad hand, or reincarnation) to get involved in an Arbitration process in which he has no history editing the topic area under consideration and no history with the parties.

Certain arbitration cases used to attract lots of comment from a small handful of busybodies who had little at stake but felt the WP world was desperately in need of their wisdom, and cases were the worse for it. I think most of them have found other entertainments.

Courts have discretion to accept or ignore Amicus briefs, and generally do not accept them from people who have no demonstrable interest in the case other than wanting to be a busybody. Arbcom has no history of such a policy but they ought to seriously think about adopting it.

Whoever Cbrick77 is, he is not a credible participant, and his comments ought to be removed. Of course, there is no procedure, policy or rule for this, and a clerk who did it on his own would probably take it up the bum from at least one Arbitrator. Which is too bad.

Hersfold has already removed part of Cla68's evidence that attempted to enlarge the scope of the Cirt-Jayen case.

Cbrick77 has told Off2riorob that he wishes to stay out of ArbCom related matters.

Apology

If that is indeed the case, perhaps an elder statesman like Thatcher can suggest as a follow-up that Cbrick77 could request that his evidence and workshop proposals be removed by a clerk.

Looks like a job for the kind of person who would likes to do that kind of thing. Maybe such a person could, I don't know, drop a note on the appropriate case page, and follow up with not one, but two requests on the user's talk page to remove the contentious material from that case page. Mathsci do you have any leads on who we could ask to do such a job? Someone with experience no doubt, who is expressing concern about the matter. But where to look, where to look ...

This post has been edited by Jagärdu:

[Mathsci]

Any other suggestions? Though before moving on did CU results show that all other known John254 socks were "related" or did some come out "unrelated" but quacking so loud that it couldn't be anything else? I see a fair number of "suspected socks" as well. I can't imagine that this is anything but John, or at least someone clever enough to mimic some of his past behavior on purpose.

What I would really like to see is Hersfold being bold and removing Chris' workshop simply because it is not reasonable for any of the things he might be (honest newbie, good hand/bad hand, or reincarnation) to get involved in an Arbitration process in which he has no history editing the topic area under consideration and no history with the parties.

Certain arbitration cases used to attract lots of comment from a small handful of busybodies who had little at stake but felt the WP world was desperately in need of their wisdom, and cases were the worse for it. I think most of them have found other entertainments.

Courts have discretion to accept or ignore Amicus briefs, and generally do not accept them from people who have no demonstrable interest in the case other than wanting to be a busybody. Arbcom has no history of such a policy but they ought to seriously think about adopting it.

Whoever Cbrick77 is, he is not a credible participant, and his comments ought to be removed. Of course, there is no procedure, policy or rule for this, and a clerk who did it on his own would probably take it up the bum from at least one Arbitrator. Which is too bad.

Hersfold has already removed part of Cla68's evidence that attempted to enlarge the scope of the Cirt-Jayen case.

Cbrick77 has told Off2riorob that he wishes to stay out of ArbCom related matters.

Apology

If that is indeed the case, perhaps an elder statesman like Thatcher can suggest as a follow-up that Cbrick77 could request that his evidence and workshop proposals be removed by a clerk.

Looks like a job for the kind of person who would likes to do that kind of thing. Maybe such a person could, I don't know, drop a note on the appropriate case page, and follow up with not one, but two requests on the user's talk page to remove the contentious material from that case page. Mathsci do you have any leads on who we could ask to do such a job? Someone with experience no doubt, who is expressing concern about the matter. But where to look, where to look ...

No idea.