QUOTE(John Limey @ Wed 17th March 2010, 7:29pm)
The theory that Wikipedia has good content but bad editors is entirely incoherent.
Right because it has damaged editors and flawed content. This is because aspects inherent in the software (anonymity, atomized content, endless levels of topic focus, repetitive tasks carefully recorded and counted, automatic attribution of edits to accounts) plays to the pathology of those attracted to wikis. It creates a self destructive dynamic both for the editors and the content.