The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Kelly blocked..., ...for insulting the ID Cabal
everyking
post Wed 24th September 2008, 8:29am
Post #21


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81



No doubt the Tznkai account is operated by the same person as back in 2006; I was abused by him back then and I remember the attitude well. I agree that there is a story to tell about this long term absence followed by a sudden return with a high level of admin activity and questionable involvement in controversial issues, and I'd like to know that story.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post Wed 24th September 2008, 11:41am
Post #22


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Tue 23rd September 2008, 11:49pm) *
He does now.. after I spent a few minutes ripping bits and pieces off him for it. Kelly's not helping with the refactoring that DID happen. (changing bad to incompetent wasn't going to help much). He was actually talking about his clerking back when Kelly Martin was part of ArbCom.. I guess he had to take some kind of emergency long term wikibreak.
There were no clerks when I was on the ArbCom.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Heat
post Wed 24th September 2008, 1:12pm
Post #23


Tenured
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 726
Joined: Mon 5th Mar 2007, 2:46am
Member No.: 1,066



So now you're not allowed to say "good move" when the ArbComm desysops someone?

This post has been edited by Heat: Wed 24th September 2008, 1:21pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post Wed 24th September 2008, 2:54pm
Post #24


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,915
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Bob Boy @ Wed 24th September 2008, 4:27am) *

Is there a dedicated group of admins that does nothing but decline unblock requests? I thought this was Sandstein's job, he seems to follow Ryulong around doing exactly that.


You noticed that? Heh. Thats what my block log says. Sandstein gave me an additional block because I emailed Ryulong to discuss my block (and says so clearly in my block log), even though the blocking procedure tells you to do that. smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Random832
post Wed 24th September 2008, 3:54pm
Post #25


meh
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,933
Joined: Thu 14th Feb 2008, 8:52pm
Member No.: 4,844

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Ottava @ Wed 24th September 2008, 2:54pm) *

QUOTE(Bob Boy @ Wed 24th September 2008, 4:27am) *

Is there a dedicated group of admins that does nothing but decline unblock requests? I thought this was Sandstein's job, he seems to follow Ryulong around doing exactly that.


You noticed that? Heh. Thats what my block log says. Sandstein gave me an additional block because I emailed Ryulong to discuss my block (and says so clearly in my block log), even though the blocking procedure tells you to do that. smile.gif


Did you send him more than one email? If you sent only one email, and if a checkuser can confirm this, you should fight it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post Wed 24th September 2008, 7:53pm
Post #26


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,915
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Random832 @ Wed 24th September 2008, 3:54pm) *

QUOTE(Ottava @ Wed 24th September 2008, 2:54pm) *

QUOTE(Bob Boy @ Wed 24th September 2008, 4:27am) *

Is there a dedicated group of admins that does nothing but decline unblock requests? I thought this was Sandstein's job, he seems to follow Ryulong around doing exactly that.


You noticed that? Heh. Thats what my block log says. Sandstein gave me an additional block because I emailed Ryulong to discuss my block (and says so clearly in my block log), even though the blocking procedure tells you to do that. smile.gif


Did you send him more than one email? If you sent only one email, and if a checkuser can confirm this, you should fight it.


It was a long time ago.

And I was in email correspondence with many admin at the time, as I was contacted by many admin at the time.

I use my real name when I email, and I discuss things upfront when I email. However, Ryulong made it clear that he was not willing to discuss with anyone, and Sandstein made it clear that he would enforce it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LaraLove
post Wed 24th September 2008, 8:28pm
Post #27


Wikipedia BLP advocate
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,741
Joined: Mon 28th Jan 2008, 7:53pm
Member No.: 4,627

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Bob Boy @ Wed 24th September 2008, 2:29am) *

Why does Kelly hate the ID Cabal so fiercely anyway? I don't see that she's ever edited those articles. Just a general religion thing?

Doesn't it have something to do with Kelly tagging SlimVirgin's image uploads as needing attention and the fallout that followed?
I'm not entirely sure. But I know when I was fighting the ID crew for round 2, s/he was there.

This post has been edited by LaraLove: Wed 24th September 2008, 8:29pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alex
post Wed 24th September 2008, 9:14pm
Post #28


Back from the dead
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,017
Joined: Wed 24th Jan 2007, 4:39pm
Member No.: 867

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Wed 24th September 2008, 12:41pm) *

QUOTE(SirFozzie @ Tue 23rd September 2008, 11:49pm) *
He does now.. after I spent a few minutes ripping bits and pieces off him for it. Kelly's not helping with the refactoring that DID happen. (changing bad to incompetent wasn't going to help much). He was actually talking about his clerking back when Kelly Martin was part of ArbCom.. I guess he had to take some kind of emergency long term wikibreak.
There were no clerks when I was on the ArbCom.


My goodness... how did you survive with the clerks?!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cla68
post Wed 24th September 2008, 11:16pm
Post #29


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,763
Joined: Fri 18th Apr 2008, 5:53pm
Member No.: 5,761

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(LaraLove @ Wed 24th September 2008, 8:28pm) *

QUOTE(Bob Boy @ Wed 24th September 2008, 2:29am) *

Why does Kelly hate the ID Cabal so fiercely anyway? I don't see that she's ever edited those articles. Just a general religion thing?

Doesn't it have something to do with Kelly tagging SlimVirgin's image uploads as needing attention and the fallout that followed?
I'm not entirely sure. But I know when I was fighting the ID crew for round 2, s/he was there.


Kelly is like a lot of contributors, I think, who have realized that a lot of nonsense is allowed to go on in Wikipedia and can't understand why it hasn't all been dealt with decisively already. So, that means that he/she doesn't have much patience with editors that he/she perceives as acting in bad faith.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Huxley
post Thu 25th September 2008, 3:40am
Post #30


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu 21st Aug 2008, 3:41pm
Member No.: 7,832



Kelly was blocked for using "thank God" with a big G.

Wikipedia only allows the praise of "gods", "God King Jimbo", "There is no (g)od", "OBAMAGod" and Allah.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
One
post Thu 25th September 2008, 4:46am
Post #31


Postmaster General
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,553
Joined: Tue 25th Dec 2007, 10:49am
Member No.: 4,284

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Heh.

Interesting unblock discussion.

B said: "Calling someone a "horribly bad admin" is hyperbole unless it is true. [...explains ArbCom evidence...] "Horribly bad" seems like a good description to me."

I agree with B, but what's notable is that no one even warned him, whereas Kelly's redacted comment earned him/her some time in the cooler. I don't think there's anything sinister going on here. Just the well-known admin double standard.

Speaking of which, Jossi is foaming at the mouth these days.

This post has been edited by One: Thu 25th September 2008, 4:54am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Giggy
post Thu 25th September 2008, 5:44am
Post #32


Über Member
*****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 755
Joined: Mon 31st Mar 2008, 3:02am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5,552

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



B wasn't the only one to not get blocked!

QUOTE
I would say it was a horribly bad block, but I might get blocked for doing so. Giggy (talk) 03:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

By Tznkai, no less. HiDrNick! 03:58, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I have blocked you for one attofortnight for that display of gross incivility. It seems the block was too short to make it to the log, though. --Carnildo (talk) 04:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


sad.gif

This post has been edited by Giggy: Thu 25th September 2008, 5:44am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Thu 25th September 2008, 10:33am
Post #33


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(everyking @ Wed 24th September 2008, 1:29am) *

No doubt the Tznkai account is operated by the same person as back in 2006; I was abused by him back then and I remember the attitude well. I agree that there is a story to tell about this long term absence followed by a sudden return with a high level of admin activity and questionable involvement in controversial issues, and I'd like to know that story.

Even the first Tznkai edits are clearly from somebody who seems rather experienced in the ways of Wikipedia and starting over. Don't give me none of this duck-to-water crap; that's only the argument the bad guys use when one of their new socks quacks like an experienced duck.

In Tsnkai's case (Tznkai I?), a list of this first edits ever shows he spent his first couple of days defending the Jewish Defence League and the LGBT rights articles. Also making sure there was no POV pushing in articles which sought to connected homosexuality and peophilia. Ah, just your usual future WP editor, licking their way up the brown snowcone.

Though I haven't identified anybody Tsnkai seems to be an obvious sock of, yet, it's interesting to look at lists of commonly edited articles between him and (say) FT2 or Jayjg or KillerChihuahua. It's fairly clear these folks are really interesed in writing about English Kings or Fermat's theorum.

Tsnkai/KillerChihuahua
#1 Theistic_evolution - edited by 2 of 2 users
#2 Self-induced_abortion - edited by 2 of 2 users
#3 Roe_v._Wade - edited by 2 of 2 users
#4 Religion_and_abortion - edited by 2 of 2 users
#5 Pregnancy - edited by 2 of 2 users
#6 Political_positions_of_Sarah_Palin - edited by 2 of 2 users
#7 LGBT_rights_opposition - edited by 2 of 2 users
#8 Kwanzaa - edited by 2 of 2 users
#9 Jesus - edited by 2 of 2 users
#10 Intelligent_design_movement - edited by 2 of 2 users
#11 Intelligent_design - edited by 2 of 2 users
#12 Human - edited by 2 of 2 users
#13 Homosexuality - edited by 2 of 2 users
#14 Halle_Berry - edited by 2 of 2 users
#15 God - edited by 2 of 2 users
#16 Fine-tuned_Universe - edited by 2 of 2 users
#17 Evolution - edited by 2 of 2 users
#18 Christianity - edited by 2 of 2 users
#19 Catholicism - edited by 2 of 2 users
#20 Abortion_debate - edited by 2 of 2 users
#21 Abortion_and_mental_health - edited by 2 of 2 users
#22 Abortion - edited by 2 of 2 users

Tznkai/FT2
#1 Kwanzaa - edited by 2 of 2 users
#2 Judas_Iscariot - edited by 2 of 2 users
#3 Jesus_in_Islam - edited by 2 of 2 users
#4 Homosexuality - edited by 2 of 2 users
#5 God - edited by 2 of 2 users
#6 George_W._Bush - edited by 2 of 2 users
#7 Gay - edited by 2 of 2 users
#8 Evolution - edited by 2 of 2 users
#9 Black_hole - edited by 2 of 2 users
#10 Asperger_syndrome - edited by 2 of 2 users
#11 Abortion - edited by 2 of 2 users

Tznkai/Jayjg

#1 Saint - edited by 2 of 2 users
#2 Neo-fascism_and_religion - edited by 2 of 2 users
#3 Nazareth - edited by 2 of 2 users
#4 Names_of_God_in_Judaism - edited by 2 of 2 users
#5 Kwanzaa - edited by 2 of 2 users
#6 Khmer_Rouge - edited by 2 of 2 users
#7 John_Hancock - edited by 2 of 2 users
#8 Jewish_Task_Force - edited by 2 of 2 users
#9 Jewish_Defense_League - edited by 2 of 2 users
#10 Jesus_in_Islam - edited by 2 of 2 users
#11 Jesus - edited by 2 of 2 users
#12 Islamofascism - edited by 2 of 2 users
#13 Human - edited by 2 of 2 users
#14 Homosexuality - edited by 2 of 2 users
#15 God - edited by 2 of 2 users
#16 George_W._Bush - edited by 2 of 2 users
#17 Exodus - edited by 2 of 2 users
#18 Christmas_controversy - edited by 2 of 2 users
#19 Christmas - edited by 2 of 2 users
#20 Christianity - edited by 2 of 2 users
#21 Childbirth - edited by 2 of 2 users
#22 Book_of_Job - edited by 2 of 2 users
#23 Anti-Zionism - edited by 2 of 2 users
#24 Ali_Sina - edited by 2 of 2 users
#25 Aisha - edited by 2 of 2 users
#26 Abortion_debate - edited by 2 of 2 users
#27 Abortion - edited by 2 of 2 users


Tznkai/Filll

#1 Theistic_evolution - edited by 2 of 2 users
#2 Names_of_God_in_Judaism - edited by 2 of 2 users
#3 List_of_works_on_intelligent_design - edited by 2 of 2 users
#4 Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District - edited by 2 of 2 users
#5 John_Hancock - edited by 2 of 2 users
#6 Intelligent_design_movement - edited by 2 of 2 users
#7 Intelligent_design - edited by 2 of 2 users
#8 Evolution - edited by 2 of 2 users
#9 Christianity - edited by 2 of 2 users
#10 Age_of_Enlightenment - edited by 2 of 2 users

Tznkai seems to be Canadian from the timezones and interests. Probably somebody in the sciences.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bob Boy
post Thu 25th September 2008, 9:29pm
Post #34


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue 20th Nov 2007, 3:07pm
Member No.: 3,899



QUOTE(One @ Wed 24th September 2008, 11:46pm) *

Speaking of which, Jossi is foaming at the mouth these days.


Jossi has been cult-follower nuts for years...I think what pissed him off was that he thought most people had forgotten or never learned about his Prem Rawat craziness, and his insanity over Sarah Palin and resulting urinary competition with Kelly brought it back to everyone's attention again.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rhindle
post Fri 26th September 2008, 12:04am
Post #35


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon 30th Jun 2008, 8:51pm
Member No.: 6,834



If this does not convince anyone that admins should not be appointed for life, I don't know what will. A dormant account for 2 years can just waltz back in with admin abilities,become an arbcom clerk, and go out blocking anyone without discussion. I don't think this account is another Dr. Strangepoet persona but this kind of thing can enable future occurences. Any dormant admin account should immediately go to Rfa at least before continuing any admin duties. This is just another rake that wikipedia keeps stepping on.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
everyking
post Fri 26th September 2008, 1:13am
Post #36


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81



QUOTE(Rhindle @ Fri 26th September 2008, 1:04am) *

If this does not convince anyone that admins should not be appointed for life, I don't know what will. A dormant account for 2 years can just waltz back in with admin abilities,become an arbcom clerk, and go out blocking anyone without discussion. I don't think this account is another Dr. Strangepoet persona but this kind of thing can enable future occurences. Any dormant admin account should immediately go to Rfa at least before continuing any admin duties. This is just another rake that wikipedia keeps stepping on.


I don't necessarily agree that he should have gone to RfA again, but he certainly should not have been reappointed as a clerk right away. To reappoint someone after such an extended absence is highly irresponsible. After Tznkai blocked Kelly, I suggested that he sit back and observe for a while to learn how the community now operates before taking further admin actions, but I suspect that a person who leaps back in with guns blazing is not the type to take advice.

This is someone who came back almost exclusively devoted to admin activity and involvement in controversies. Although he has made a lot of edits since returning, WP:AN, WP:ANI, and the talk pages of controversial articles like Intelligent design, Abortion, and Sarah Palin are dominant on his 2008 contributions list. I couldn't find any content creation since his return; indeed, it appears virtually all of his activity is fixated on controversies of various kinds. He didn't come back to be an editor--he came back to throw his weight around.

This post has been edited by everyking: Fri 26th September 2008, 1:24am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post Fri 26th September 2008, 8:35pm
Post #37


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,915
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(everyking @ Fri 26th September 2008, 1:13am) *

QUOTE(Rhindle @ Fri 26th September 2008, 1:04am) *

If this does not convince anyone that admins should not be appointed for life, I don't know what will. A dormant account for 2 years can just waltz back in with admin abilities,become an arbcom clerk, and go out blocking anyone without discussion. I don't think this account is another Dr. Strangepoet persona but this kind of thing can enable future occurences. Any dormant admin account should immediately go to Rfa at least before continuing any admin duties. This is just another rake that wikipedia keeps stepping on.


I don't necessarily agree that he should have gone to RfA again, but he certainly should not have been reappointed as a clerk right away. To reappoint someone after such an extended absence is highly irresponsible. After Tznkai blocked Kelly, I suggested that he sit back and observe for a while to learn how the community now operates before taking further admin actions, but I suspect that a person who leaps back in with guns blazing is not the type to take advice.

This is someone who came back almost exclusively devoted to admin activity and involvement in controversies. Although he has made a lot of edits since returning, WP:AN, WP:ANI, and the talk pages of controversial articles like Intelligent design, Abortion, and Sarah Palin are dominant on his 2008 contributions list. I couldn't find any content creation since his return; indeed, it appears virtually all of his activity is fixated on controversies of various kinds. He didn't come back to be an editor--he came back to throw his weight around.



tznkai is a decent person, and most of this is just overblown gibber jabber by people who aren't willing to look at the situation objectively. Why else would there be instant conspiracy theories?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rhindle
post Fri 26th September 2008, 10:32pm
Post #38


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon 30th Jun 2008, 8:51pm
Member No.: 6,834



QUOTE(Ottava @ Fri 26th September 2008, 1:35pm) *

QUOTE(everyking @ Fri 26th September 2008, 1:13am) *

QUOTE(Rhindle @ Fri 26th September 2008, 1:04am) *








tznkai is a decent person, and most of this is just overblown gibber jabber by people who aren't willing to look at the situation objectively. Why else would there be instant conspiracy theories?


There may be no conspiracy and I never suggested there was. A dormant admin account allowed to come back like this is just a bad idea. Everything may be fine in this case but the potential problems sure make it easy for "gibber jabber" about "instant conspricacy theories" and even things that turn out to be true.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post Fri 26th September 2008, 11:00pm
Post #39


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,915
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Rhindle @ Fri 26th September 2008, 10:32pm) *

There may be no conspiracy and I never suggested there was. A dormant admin account allowed to come back like this is just a bad idea. Everything may be fine in this case but the potential problems sure make it easy for "gibber jabber" about "instant conspricacy theories" and even things that turn out to be true.


I'm not necessarily referring to you or to events on WR. There is chatter outside of WR on this topic, after all. tongue.gif

He is currently disputing with the so called "ID Cabal" somewhat on the talk page of the Intelligent Design page, so, his blocking to help them wouldn't make sense.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Fri 26th September 2008, 11:25pm
Post #40


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Bob Boy @ Thu 25th September 2008, 2:29pm) *

QUOTE(One @ Wed 24th September 2008, 11:46pm) *

Speaking of which, Jossi is foaming at the mouth these days.


Jossi has been cult-follower nuts for years...I think what pissed him off was that he thought most people had forgotten or never learned about his Prem Rawat craziness, and his insanity over Sarah Palin and resulting urinary competition with Kelly brought it back to everyone's attention again.

Speaking of which, due to general contentiousness about the same group of subjects, the Tznkai/Jossi cross is the longest I've yet to get. And look at the articles!


#1 Theistic_evolution - edited by 2 of 2 users
#2 Sarah_Palin - edited by 2 of 2 users
#3 Saint - edited by 2 of 2 users
#4 Ronald_Reagan - edited by 2 of 2 users
#5 Robert_Frost - edited by 2 of 2 users
#6 Religion - edited by 2 of 2 users
#7 Pregnancy - edited by 2 of 2 users
#8 Political_positions_of_Sarah_Palin - edited by 2 of 2 users
#9 Names_of_God_in_Judaism - edited by 2 of 2 users
#10 Muhammad - edited by 2 of 2 users
#11 Lyndon_B._Johnson - edited by 2 of 2 users
#12 List_of_gay,_lesbian_or_bisexual_people - edited by 2 of 2 users
#13 Kwanzaa - edited by 2 of 2 users
#14 Joseph_Stalin - edited by 2 of 2 users
#15 John_Hancock - edited by 2 of 2 users
#16 Jihad - edited by 2 of 2 users
#17 Jesus - edited by 2 of 2 users
#18 Japanese_people - edited by 2 of 2 users
#19 James_Wolfe - edited by 2 of 2 users
#20 Jack_Thompson_(attorney) - edited by 2 of 2 users
#21 Islamofascism - edited by 2 of 2 users
#22 Internet - edited by 2 of 2 users
#23 Intelligent_design_movement - edited by 2 of 2 users
#24 Intelligent_design - edited by 2 of 2 users
#25 Hurricane_Beta_(2005) - edited by 2 of 2 users
#26 Human - edited by 2 of 2 users
#27 Homosexuality - edited by 2 of 2 users
#28 God - edited by 2 of 2 users
#29 George_W._Bush - edited by 2 of 2 users
#30 Gay–straight_alliance - edited by 2 of 2 users
#31 Gay - edited by 2 of 2 users
#32 Evolution - edited by 2 of 2 users
#33 Crusades - edited by 2 of 2 users
#34 Cock - edited by 2 of 2 users
#35 Christmas - edited by 2 of 2 users
#36 Christianity - edited by 2 of 2 users
#37 Buddhahood - edited by 2 of 2 users
#38 Beaver - edited by 2 of 2 users
#39 Attention-deficit_hyperactivity_disorder - edited by 2 of 2 users
#40 Asshole - edited by 2 of 2 users
#41 American_Revolutionary_War - edited by 2 of 2 users
#42 Age_of_Enlightenment - edited by 2 of 2 users
#43 Academia - edited by 2 of 2 users
#44 Abu_Musab_al-Zarqawi - edited by 2 of 2 users
#45 Abortion - edited by 2 of 2 users
#46 AIDS - edited by 2 of 2 users

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th 5 13, 10:00pm