FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Jimbo seeks to assist Tony Blair Faith Foundation -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Jimbo seeks to assist Tony Blair Faith Foundation
thekohser
post
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



Here's Jimbo, doing his thing, helping out some of the "good guys" who are dissatisfied with their portrayal on Jimbo's big encyclopedia.

Now, tell me... does anyone remember if Jimbo might have some personal connection to Tony Blair? My memory might be slipping a bit, and I don't want to be accused of "stalking" poor Jimbo.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
timbo
post
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 102
Joined:
Member No.: 21,141



Jimmy Wales is, very much to his credit, attempting to defend his conception of how COI editing should be done — which is to say, through intermediaries. I think a more workable approach would be for him to have said: "Go ahead and edit your page if you feel you can do it non-controversally and in accord with our principles of Verifiability and Neutral Point of View — but be advised that in so doing you are walking a tightrope with no net in front of a large audience with a taste for gore."

As Mr. Kohs is well aware, the COI editing issue is very "hot" right now. Mr. Wales is trying to show that his model for handling this situation works.

As for connections between Wales and Blair, the smirking centrist-hating red in me suggests that it probably has something to do with both those individuals sharing an affinity for the political ideas of Ayn Rand.


t
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Fusion
post
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 346
Joined:
Member No.: 71,526



QUOTE(timbo @ Fri 9th March 2012, 5:29pm) *

Jimmy Wales is, very much to his credit, attempting to defend his conception of how COI editing should be done — which is to say, through intermediaries. I think a more workable approach would be for him to have said: "Go ahead and edit your page if you feel you can do it non-controversally and in accord with our principles of Verifiability and Neutral Point of View — but be advised that in so doing you are walking a tightrope with no net in front of a large audience with a taste for gore."

It is a very workable solution to hire intermediaries, and I know that many have done so. Of course, it is only working if you have people good enough to avoid controversy and to appear NPOV.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post
Post #4


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Fusion @ Sat 10th March 2012, 9:11am) *

It is a very workable solution to hire intermediaries, and I know that many have done so. Of course, it is only working if you have people good enough to avoid controversy and to appear NPOV.

It's a banner day, apparently, because +1 for Fusion.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)