QUOTE(SB_Johnny @ Fri 24th February 2012, 8:33pm)
QUOTE(lilburne @ Fri 24th February 2012, 3:25pm)
QUOTE(Selina @ Fri 24th February 2012, 8:10pm)
Fox News isn't exactly known for researching off much more than Youtube (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/wink.gif)
But now we can add Examiner to their list of quality sources too.
Face fucking palm. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif)
Well done, Fox. I guess this came from Larry?
QUOTE
“Discussions have been under way for quite some time about how controversial content should be labeled or categorized,†Jay Walsh, a Wikipedia spokesperson, told FoxNews.com.
And there I thought the board had decided that there was not going to be any content labeling or categorisation. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/confused.gif)
Selection and implementation of an image filter was due to begin in January. It was due to be discussed at a Foundation Board meeting a couple of weeks back, but in the end, Jimbo said, the Board didn't get round to it.
This post has been edited by HRIP7: