FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Dana Countryman -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Discussions in this subforum are hidden from search engines.

However, they are not hidden from automobile engines, including the newer, more "environmentally-friendly" electric and hybrid engines. Also, please note that this subforum is meant to be used for discussion of the actual biographical articles themselves; more generalized discussions of BLP policy should be posted in the General Discussion or Bureaucracy forums.

> Dana Countryman
EricBarbour
post
Post #1


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066



Here's your outrageously self-promoting BLP of the week:

Dana Countryman (T-H-L-K-D)

Being manicured by an IP address that happens to come from the Seattle area--
hometown of Dana Countryman. Said IP address has also spent a great amount of time editing
articles that Dana Countryman is clearly interested in, such as Seattle (T-H-L-K-D),
Jean-Jacques Perrey (T-H-L-K-D), Perrey and Kingsley (T-H-L-K-D), Ondes Martenot (T-H-L-K-D), etc.

And he's been doing it since 2004. And nobody has said a word.

(PS: Countryman's website is one of the ugliest I have seen in years.)

This post has been edited by EricBarbour:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Detective
post
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 331
Joined:
Member No.: 35,179



I was intrigued by this edit summary:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=448861637

"Reverted edits by Mrs.miller1 (talk) unexplained removal of content (HG)"

As a result of this reversion, the article dropped in size from 8,401 bytes to the 7,356 that Alison left it with. Thus Mrs.miller1 must have added more than she removed, so Jeff G is at least as guilty as she is of unexplained removal of content.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Michaeldsuarez
post
Post #3


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 562
Joined:
From: New York, New York
Member No.: 24,428



QUOTE(Detective @ Mon 10th October 2011, 11:02am) *

I was intrigued by this edit summary:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=448861637

"Reverted edits by Mrs.miller1 (talk) unexplained removal of content (HG)"

As a result of this reversion, the article dropped in size from 8,401 bytes to the 7,356 that Alison left it with. Thus Mrs.miller1 must have added more than she removed, so Jeff G is at least as guilty as she is of unexplained removal of content.


http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=448862925

In his or her message to Mrs.miller1, Jeff_G. links to the following revision:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Countryman?diff=448856252

Jeff_G. apparently didn't believe The New York Times reference should've been removed. The bad part is that Jeff_G. reverted everything Mrs.miller1 revised in order to restore a single reference. Sounds as if it was done out of laziness, because rollbacking those revisions wholesale was easier than trying to work with those revisions.

This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)