Wow... Filll has really got some over-the-top claims about the evidence he's not actually going to show anyone.
QUOTE(09:51 @ June 24, 2008 Filll)
I do not think so. I think if I mounted a serious defense, a good half dozen or more people's feelings would be badly hurt, right off the bat. I think that they would feel they would have to defend against my posts, and attack me even more fiercely. And I would have to respond. And so on. It would fill many many kilobytes. It would take many days, or weeks, or months. It would just inflame the dispute.
Look at how upset people were at the barebones RfC that was deleted. People were upset they were named. People said it was unfair. And on and on and on. And that RfC did not even get started. There was no meat on those bones at all. It was the barest beginning.
You would see Wikipedia Review completely outraged. There would be a massive campaign to recruit more people to attack and threaten. The attacks would escalate. People who were blocked 6 months or a year or two ago would get excited and jump on the bandwagon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=221471182I considered adding some commentary, but how can I top a quote like that?