ID Cabal Request for Comment Options

[Bob Boy]

Odd nature is asking that Giggy remove any references to actions of the Intelligent Design Cabal from off-wiki forums (including Wikipedia Review). Good luck with that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_tal...ersonal_attacks

[Moulton]

Getting back on topic...

At the bottom of Filll's talk page, we find this...

Enough

This has gone far enough. Stop adding attacks on me to your userspace, accusing me of being a "Wikipedia Review editor." I don't condone or promote that site at all, and on the contrary I was outed by them and members have tried to make disturbing advances on me there. Please stop trying to smear and provoke me. krimpet✽ 22:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Do not remove material that is part of an Arbcomm proceeding. Thanks. And it did not explicitly label you as a "Wikipedia Review editor", did it? Although you are a member of Wikipedia Review and an editor here, so it is quite accurate, isn't it? --Filll (talk | wpc) 23:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

And yet, FeloniousMonk cites an evidence page in his own user space that he has since moved and then deleted.

Moreover, Filll refers to the same deleted page at RfC/ID.

And for the record, I've asked that the deleted page (which still exists on Static Wikipedia) be restored as it has been placed into evidence by two of the ID Editors.

[Proabivouac]

This has gone far enough. Stop adding attacks on me to your userspace, accusing me of being a "Wikipedia Review editor." I don't condone or promote that site at all, and on the contrary I was outed by them and members have tried to make disturbing advances on me there. Please stop trying to smear and provoke me. krimpet✽ 22:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=221187473

I don't remember anything like this happening.

Is there some other site called "Wikipedia Review"? It would explain a lot.

This post has been edited by Proabivouac:

[SirFozzie]

This has gone far enough. Stop adding attacks on me to your userspace, accusing me of being a "Wikipedia Review editor." I don't condone or promote that site at all, and on the contrary I was outed by them and members have tried to make disturbing advances on me there. Please stop trying to smear and provoke me. krimpet✽ 22:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=221187473

I don't remember anything like this happening.

Is there some other site called "Wikipedia Review"? It would explain a lot.

She's referring to your comments about her hotness, etcetera.

[Proabivouac]

She's referring to your comments about her hotness, etcetera.

How should you know what she's referring to? It's not obvious.

By "etc.", do you mean me inviting her to apologize for her unprovoked aggression? Some "advance."

For the sake of humor I was being far more generous than I might have otherwise been (and people often provide only headshots for a reason.) What, would you prefer I yell at her for being such a hypocrite and a liar? She condemns WR for outing her - though it was Brandt who did, and Alison who announced it here - but when a member of Wikipedia Review really did out someone, what did she do?

There were no "disturbing advances" from anyone on this site, and she knows it. She also knows that you can say whatever lies you want about WR without anyone calling you on it - in fact, it's nearly required - so she does it because it wins her loyalty points and because she's a dishonest person.

Even when I agree with her, the dishonesty is painful. Didn't she state that she came across the Picard issue on her own, never having read about here? Please. Just like Elonka didn't solicit her on IRC.

This post has been edited by Proabivouac:

[Moulton]

Didn't she state that she came across the Picard issue on her own, never having read about here?

I'm pretty sure I would have done a double take had I seen anything like that. To the best of my knowledge, she picked up on the Picard BLP from something I had posted here.

What she stated is that she was not a meatpuppet, but acted on her own volition to correct the article.