FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Elen v. ArbCom -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Elen v. ArbCom
Ottava
post
Post #1


Ãœber Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined:
Member No.: 7,328



If anything needs to show how corrupt Arbitrators as a whole are, their actions towards Elen should be enough evidence for a community ban. Unfortunately, they scarred too many of the legitimate editors into ever removing those problematic users who manipulated and gained their way into seats of power on a site they have little purpose ever being on to begin with.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Retrospect
post
Post #2


Londoner born and bred
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 263
Joined:
From: London
Member No.: 71,989



QUOTE(Ottava @ Thu 24th January 2013, 2:13am) *

If anything needs to show how corrupt Arbitrators as a whole are, their actions towards Elen should be enough evidence for a community ban. Unfortunately, they scarred too many of the legitimate editors into ever removing those problematic users who manipulated and gained their way into seats of power on a site they have little purpose ever being on to begin with.

Do you mean "If anything is needed to show"? If they've ruddy scarred any users, they should be charged with assault. Still, if they've scarred legitimate users into removing problematic users, that isn't a bad thing.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post
Post #3


Ãœber Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined:
Member No.: 7,328



QUOTE(Retrospect @ Thu 24th January 2013, 3:41am) *

QUOTE(Ottava @ Thu 24th January 2013, 2:13am) *

If anything needs to show how corrupt Arbitrators as a whole are, their actions towards Elen should be enough evidence for a community ban. Unfortunately, they scarred too many of the legitimate editors into ever removing those problematic users who manipulated and gained their way into seats of power on a site they have little purpose ever being on to begin with.

Do you mean "If anything is needed to show"?


No. I mean anything. The only logical grammar fix you could suggest is "Do you mean 'If anyone needs to show'." You didn't suggest that because you didn't get that I said thing - people, newspapers, reports, studies, etc.

Try to learn English before responding next time.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Retrospect
post
Post #4


Londoner born and bred
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 263
Joined:
From: London
Member No.: 71,989



QUOTE(Ottava @ Fri 25th January 2013, 3:36am) *

No. I mean anything. The only logical grammar fix you could suggest is "Do you mean 'If anyone needs to show'." You didn't suggest that because you didn't get that I said thing - people, newspapers, reports, studies, etc.

Try to learn English before responding next time.

QUOTE(NotASpamBot @ Tue 8th January 2013, 12:54am) *

Obviously, attempting to talk to you about any of this is an exercise in the ridiculous. In fact, it's akin to speaking clear and concise advanced English with someone who is an ELL, rather an adult who claims English as their first language.



This post has been edited by Retrospect:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)