The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Rlevse returned, Has Rlevse returned to plague FAC?
chrisoff
post Wed 1st February 2012, 9:43pm
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu 18th Feb 2010, 11:20pm
Member No.: 17,248



Seems that Rlevse has returned as PumpkinSky SPECIFICALLY to poison the well at FAC.

He caused the "sour grapes" effect at the recent RFC at WT:FAC over Raul654's "Director for Life" RFC


And Rlevse caused the nastiness and viciousness at Wt:FAC in general


But Elen of the Roads says he's not to be blocked for that or for a few copyvios here and there!

but, but! There's ax grinding against SandyGeorgia by three who are three grinding an axe: Rlevse, TCO who unvanished, and Alarbus

Wait! She forgot to mention Wehwalt. (This should distract them all from Malleus's cunt problem at the Civility Arbcom)

Where do we find the SPI? Wasn't that the one that TCO wrongly accused of being Mattisse (which was goofy as all heck), bringing Risker down on his head? In other words, I belive someone has checkuser data on BarkingMoon, and can say where he geolocates

Matisse must be climbing the walls!

This post has been edited by chrisoff: Wed 1st February 2012, 9:46pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Abd
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 12:11am
Post #2


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,916
Joined: Tue 18th Nov 2008, 10:52pm
From: Northampton, MA, USA
Member No.: 9,019

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



From User talk:Raul654:
QUOTE
OK, now that he's been confirmed as a sockpuppet, I'll help break out the pitchforks. I've just about had it with him and the trouble he's caused. [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] ([[User talk:Raul654#top|talk]]) 20:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Raul loves to break out the pitchforks. Someone should stick a fork in him, he's stuck them in so many others, there are only a few Wikipedians who have done more damage than him.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chrisoff
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:05am
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu 18th Feb 2010, 11:20pm
Member No.: 17,248



Well, he hasn't been "confirmed as a sockpuppet" as Raul654 claims.


The real problem is that PumpkinSky was one of 4 editors who dared to oppose Raul's "Director for Live" Rfc

The bloody nerve! So Raul654 and SandyGeorgia et al are going to pick them off one by one. All the other FAC slaves kowtowed.

All evidence is that PumpkinSky was extremely productive and an asset to wp.

Others found him kind, gracious and helpful


But SandyGeorgia sees it all as a plot against her and FAC

No wonder wp is dying! Drive off the productive editors!

Once again, vested Admin Moni3 uses her admin tools to block at SandyGeorgia's beckening! Blocks PumpkinSky!

This post has been edited by chrisoff: Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:26am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mbz1
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:23am
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 10:50pm
Member No.: 25,791



It is interesting they tagged the account http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PumpkinSky
The tag claims he's blocked, but he is not, and hopefully will not be.
After all Prioryman  (T-C-L-K-R-D) AKA Vanished user 03 AKA ChriO also came back and is allowed to stay.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Michaeldsuarez
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:26am
Post #5


Über Member
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon 9th Aug 2010, 7:51pm
From: New York, New York
Member No.: 24,428

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(mbz1 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 8:23pm) *

It is interesting they tagged the account http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PumpkinSky
The tag claims he's blocked, but he is not, and hopefully will not be.
After all Prioryman  (T-C-L-K-R-D) AKA Vanished user 03 AKA ChriO also came back and is allowed to stay.


http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...er%3APumpkinSky

PumpkinSky has been blocked since 00:00, 2 February 2012 UTC.

This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez: Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:26am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mbz1
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:31am
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 10:50pm
Member No.: 25,791



QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:26am) *

QUOTE(mbz1 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 8:23pm) *

It is interesting they tagged the account http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PumpkinSky
The tag claims he's blocked, but he is not, and hopefully will not be.
After all Prioryman  (T-C-L-K-R-D) AKA Vanished user 03 AKA ChriO also came back and is allowed to stay.


http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...er%3APumpkinSky

PumpkinSky has been blocked since 00:00, 2 February 2012 UTC.

Oh well... But how he abuses multiple accounts? His other accounts are blocked, and he was not banned or something. Why ChriO was treated differently?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chrisoff
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:36am
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu 18th Feb 2010, 11:20pm
Member No.: 17,248



There hasn't been a CU; it is merely vested admin's Moni3's abuse of admin tools (once again) . There's no proof that I'm aware of.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cla68
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:38am
Post #8


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,763
Joined: Fri 18th Apr 2008, 5:53pm
Member No.: 5,761

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(chrisoff @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:36am) *

There hasn't been a CU; it is merely vested admin's Moni3's abuse of admin tools (once again) . There's no proof that I'm aware of.


Rlevse was accused of plagiarism, while ChrisO/Prioryman merely engaged in abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing. I guess there is a difference in severity.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chrisoff
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:48am
Post #9


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu 18th Feb 2010, 11:20pm
Member No.: 17,248



Accused (by SandyGeorgia) but not proved.

The vast amount of his mainspace edits were constructive, says CU Amalthea.

Where is the CU, or is this another instance of SandyGeorgia manipulating Arbcom and everyone else to block a constructive editor because of one of her peeves?

The Arbcom is being totalling undermined and has lost all credibility (if they had any.)


This post has been edited by chrisoff: Thu 2nd February 2012, 2:05am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mbz1
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 2:08am
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 10:50pm
Member No.: 25,791



QUOTE(Cla68 @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:38am) *

QUOTE(chrisoff @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:36am) *

There hasn't been a CU; it is merely vested admin's Moni3's abuse of admin tools (once again) . There's no proof that I'm aware of.


Rlevse was accused of plagiarism, while ChrisO/Prioryman merely engaged in abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing. I guess there is a difference in severity.

But what is more severe?

And what this https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w...oldid=474489625 is about? Is TungstenCarbide is also Rlevse wtf.gif
Ah, I see, wikipidiots believed that PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) because their user names are alike, but now they confirmed PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is not PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) , which means PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is not Rlevse, but then it means that PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) whoever he is was not abusing multiple accounts, and should be unblocked.

This post has been edited by mbz1: Thu 2nd February 2012, 2:46am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chrisoff
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 2:40am
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu 18th Feb 2010, 11:20pm
Member No.: 17,248



QUOTE(mbz1 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 9:08pm) *

QUOTE(Cla68 @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:38am) *

QUOTE(chrisoff @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:36am) *

There hasn't been a CU; it is merely vested admin's Moni3's abuse of admin tools (once again) . There's no proof that I'm aware of.


Rlevse was accused of plagiarism, while ChrisO/Prioryman merely engaged in abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing. I guess there is a difference in severity.

But what is more severe?


Accused is not the same as proven. PumpkinSky was accused by SandyGeorgia. But so far the checks on his edits have not revealed massive copyvio. When SandyGeorgia blanked one of his DYKs on the main page, the evidence of copyvio was borderline - something any of us could have mistakenly done.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
iii
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 7:03am
Post #12


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed 19th Jan 2011, 12:39am
Member No.: 38,992



QUOTE(Cla68 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 8:38pm) *

Rlevse was accused of plagiarism, while ChrisO/Prioryman merely engaged in abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing. I guess there is a difference in severity.


I can't let this slide. Everyone outside of the Wikipedia-world knows what plagiarism is. No one outside of the Wikipedia world will know what any of the these "abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing" buzzwords are supposed to mean. Couldn't you have said, "defamation, arguing, and inserting personal bias"?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
trenton
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 7:12am
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri 12th Sep 2008, 10:21pm
Member No.: 8,237



Poor guy.... goes to show you that Randy's wiki-addiction is stronger than any principles he claimed to have, as he was an arbitrator who came down particularly hard on returning "vanished" users.

Randy's problem is that he's not particularly smart (witness the whole Randy in Boise situation, and not knowing what plagiarism is). That the guy feels that he must write "Featured Articles" is a symptom of Wikipedia's perverse system of climbing the ladder.

As for Mr. Raul:

QUOTE(Raul654)
For the record, this is absolutely not the first time Rlevse has come back after his RTV. About a week after he left, he created another account. A firestorm ensued, and he left after a day or two. I am wracking my brain but I cannot remember the name of that account. (Someone help me here) Raul654 (talk) 22:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


Well you can't remember because this is another one of your fantasies.... (we can ask Everyking about Raul's "recollections"). To set the chain of events straight, Rlevse said he'd quit, then started editing again a few days later, then "vanished".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
iii
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 7:30am
Post #14


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed 19th Jan 2011, 12:39am
Member No.: 38,992



QUOTE(trenton @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 2:12am) *

Poor guy.... goes to show you that Randy's wiki-addiction is stronger than any principles he claimed to have, as he was an arbitrator who came down particularly hard on returning "vanished" users.


Funny that. Wikipedia's principle that discourages "vanished" or "banned" or "blocked" from editing is so weirdly moralistic. It's not like it's some minor little corner of the internet that's easy to ignore. Especially not so if the person trying to do the ignoring has dedicated a significant amount of time in the past to learning the way editing the website works.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
alan323
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 10:49am
Post #15


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun 20th Jul 2008, 5:27pm
Member No.: 7,168



QUOTE(iii @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 7:03am) *

QUOTE(Cla68 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 8:38pm) *

Rlevse was accused of plagiarism, while ChrisO/Prioryman merely engaged in abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing. I guess there is a difference in severity.


I can't let this slide. Everyone outside of the Wikipedia-world knows what plagiarism is. No one outside of the Wikipedia world will know what any of the these "abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing" buzzwords are supposed to mean. Couldn't you have said, "defamation, arguing, and inserting personal bias"?

Or simply 'disagreeing with Cla68'.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:49pm
Post #16


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(mbz1 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 9:08pm) *

Ah, I see, wikipidiots believed that PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) because their user names are alike, but now they confirmed PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is not PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) , which means PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is not Rlevse, but then it means that PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) whoever he is was not abusing multiple accounts, and should be unblocked.


It's the Great Pumpkin, Jimmy Wales! smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mbz1
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 3:21pm
Post #17


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 10:50pm
Member No.: 25,791



QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:49pm) *

QUOTE(mbz1 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 9:08pm) *

Ah, I see, wikipidiots believed that PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) because their user names are alike, but now they confirmed PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is not PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) , which means PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is not Rlevse, but then it means that PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) whoever he is was not abusing multiple accounts, and should be unblocked.


It's the Great Pumpkin, Jimmy Wales! smile.gif

It looks that rather sooner than later they will have to stop blocking socks of banned editors simply because most "new" editors will be socks of old, banned ones. smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TungstenCarbide
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 4:26pm
Post #18


Allegedly shot down by stray Ukrainian missile
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,405
Joined: Sat 14th Mar 2009, 6:12am
Member No.: 10,787

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(mbz1 @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 2:08am) *

QUOTE(Cla68 @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:38am) *

QUOTE(chrisoff @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:36am) *

There hasn't been a CU; it is merely vested admin's Moni3's abuse of admin tools (once again) . There's no proof that I'm aware of.


Rlevse was accused of plagiarism, while ChrisO/Prioryman merely engaged in abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing. I guess there is a difference in severity.

But what is more severe?

And what this https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w...oldid=474489625 is about? Is TungstenCarbide is also Rlevse wtf.gif
Ah, I see, wikipidiots believed that PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) because their user names are alike, but now they confirmed PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is not PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) , which means PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D) is not Rlevse, but then it means that PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D) whoever he is was not abusing multiple accounts, and should be unblocked.


just a coinkidink - although I'm tempted to have some fun with this. There are a whole bunch of variations on that account name and only one of them is me - just goes to show how gullible and idiotic some of these blocking admins are.

Oh, and by the way, Tnxman307 is a Bastard. He made me reboot my modem and get a new account - I want those 45 seconds of my life back, dammit.

This post has been edited by TungstenCarbide: Thu 2nd February 2012, 4:33pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chrisoff
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 5:12pm
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu 18th Feb 2010, 11:20pm
Member No.: 17,248



Look at the FAC crowd who blocked Rlevse without a CU

This is totally corrupt!

I wonder how many editors have been blocked/banned without any kind of due process but merely out of whim.

SandyGeorge has been warned to stop the personal attacks, calling editors socks without any attempt at proof, by Elen of the Roads
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mbz1
post Thu 2nd February 2012, 5:24pm
Post #20


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 10:50pm
Member No.: 25,791



QUOTE(chrisoff @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 5:12pm) *

Look at the FAC crowd who blocked Rlevse without a CU

This is totally corrupt!

I wonder how many editors have been blocked/banned without any kind of due process but merely out of whim.

SandyGeorge has been warned to stop the personal attacks, calling editors socks without any attempt at proof, by Elen of the Roads

Yet the same Elen supported the block
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th 5 17, 1:31pm