FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Russavia, Pricasso, Jimbo, and Commons -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Russavia, Pricasso, Jimbo, and Commons
Michaeldsuarez
post
Post #1


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 562
Joined:
From: New York, New York
Member No.: 24,428



The Daily Dot - How Wikimedia Commons became a massive amateur porn hub by Kevin Morris:

QUOTE
This day's painting was special, however. For one, the man commissioning the painting never revealed his real name. And rather than pay money directly, he suggested a trade: I'm going to write a Wikipedia article about you, he said, and you penis-paint the face of Jimmy Wales, the cofounder of the largest and most influential encyclopedia in the world. The painting would then be added to the article.

"I was surprised that someone would do an article on me," Pricasso told me. "I thought what the hell—I'd do it."

It took him 30 minutes.

Days later, a photograph of the painting, as well as an explicit making-of video, was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a media repository run by the Wikimedia Foundation, which also oversees Wikipedia. The entry launched a storm of controversy, precipitated by no less than Wales himself, who publicly declared the video a form of sexual harassment.

More troubling for the community: The Wikimedian who uploaded the video, Russavia, was an influential, eight-year veteran of the Foundation, who'd had several public clashes with Wales in recent months.

Was Russavia the same man who commissioned the painting, Wikipedians wondered? Was he seeking revenge on Wales? And if the founder of Wikipedia himself is powerless to stop sexual harassment on Wikimedia Commons, what hope do the rest of us have?


Feel free to discuss the article.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Text
post
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 491
Joined:
Member No.: 15,107



Internet is full of attention whores who will almost do anything to have a piece of article somewhere. Even if they're going to be slandered in it. It must be a pathological thing.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Detective
post
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 331
Joined:
Member No.: 35,179



QUOTE(Text @ Wed 10th July 2013, 10:24pm) *

Internet is full of attention whores who will almost do anything to have a piece of article somewhere. Even if they're going to be slandered in it. It must be a pathological thing.

That's what keeps Wikipedia going, really.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)