QUOTE(Cla68 @ Sat 3rd December 2011, 12:56am)
He is saying that WR emits feces and such foul waste.
With all due respect, Charles... he's actually saying that
Wikipedia (not Wikipedia Review) is a sort of living organism that takes in nutrients (editors and their content), digests them and becomes a stronger, more powerful organism. Of course, any organism that grows through consumption must also take a shit once in a while, to expel the unneeded by-products of the metabolic process.
Wikipedia's "anus", therefore, is where the unneeded by-products are expelled. I guess the anus would be a fleshy muscle composed of "Articles for deletion" and "Ban discussions" and pages reserved for "Jimbo breaking up with mistresses", if we were to take this personification the least bit seriously.
And he clearly said that Wikipedia Review is thus a cancerous wart on the anus of Wikipedia.
(Of course, a wart is a benign skin growth that is not subject to being cancerous, so his intelligence is rather questionable from the get-go.)