The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> How to fork a wiki
post Fri 8th January 2010, 5:04pm
Post #21

Skinny Cow!

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,514
Joined: Tue 26th Jun 2007, 8:08pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 1,806

QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Fri 8th January 2010, 6:28am) *

... is anyone here capturing dumps on a regular basis in order that they can analyze all the oversights and page removals that are going on?

Why?? 99.9% of them are boring, boring bored.gif
  • "I edited while logged out and people can see where I am!!11!!"
  • Personal information on children.
  • "For a good time, call Cathie 555-1234 (not her ex - honest!!)"
  • Stupid Grawp libel / outtage
  • Really nasty pieces of libelous BLP edits.
... in decreasing order of magnitude.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Fri 8th January 2010, 6:35pm
Post #22

Now censored by and who else ... ???

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,693
Joined: Sat 6th Dec 2008, 6:08am
Member No.: 9,267

QUOTE(Alison @ Fri 8th January 2010, 5:04pm) *

Why ... a bit like most cults, the mystique only works if extensive historical revision goes on.

The leaders are able to constantly hide their sins, and incompetence. Newcomers keep coming along and getting sucked in because they know nothing of all the shit in the past and cannot believe it.

People need to see it to believe it.

I want an older revision which has more of the pedophile stuff in it to make a presentation in order to send it to some the funding trusts.

Pedophilia ... pornography ... freaky sex ... nationalism ... cultists ... especially where there is admin involvement. That kind of stuff, e.g. perhaps some of the "deleted from public view" hard core porno images that kid admins still have access to.

I have realised stupidly (it has taken this long but I was not to committed before) that what we need are snapshots going back 6, 12, 18 ... months etc because they are becoming to smart at "disappearing" stuff in order to keep up appearances. And a lot of you guys here are doing too good a job clearing it off. Doing them the favor.

I am sorry. They allow or empowers kids to defend cult followers whose leaders have covered up and done nothing about child sex abuse within their midst ... the conversation has to opened up and discussed more widely.

It is pointless trying to address or converse with the rabble, so I would rather go around the back and discuss with the funders.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 2 18, 10:00am