The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Sue's five-year plan, strategery in motion
thekohser
post Wed 20th January 2010, 3:43pm
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



Sue Gardner has posted the new Five-Year Plan.

BayNewser sums it up as follows:

QUOTE
Wikimedia Not Going to Invest in China, Africa, Paid Editors


And my comment there:

QUOTE
In other words, the WMF will continue to geek out on hard drives, bandwidth, and marveling at how many page views they garner. But, they will do nothing to work responsibly and ethically toward building a higher-quality, reliable compendium of human knowledge. Thus driving home the truth that Wikipedia is a massive online role-playing game, not an educational charity project. In a word, fraudulent.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Wed 20th January 2010, 3:56pm
Post #2


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,783
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Wut!? — No benchmarks for the wheat harvest?

Jon dizzy.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GlassBeadGame
post Wed 20th January 2010, 4:06pm
Post #3


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981



QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 20th January 2010, 10:43am) *

Sue Gardner has posted the new Five-Year Plan.

BayNewser sums it up as follows:

QUOTE
Wikimedia Not Going to Invest in China, Africa, Paid Editors


And my comment there:

QUOTE
In other words, the WMF will continue to geek out on hard drives, bandwidth, and marveling at how many page views they garner. But, they will do nothing to work responsibly and ethically toward building a higher-quality, reliable compendium of human knowledge. Thus driving home the truth that Wikipedia is a massive online role-playing game, not an educational charity project. In a word, fraudulent.



The article was very good, especially in identifying what options where rejected. The odd thing about the plan is how divorced from budget it is. It is hard to see how a plan dominated by tech infrastructure can justify a budget in excess of 10 times what was spent prior to Gardner. After all the demand has only grown modestly and is leveling out, maybe even declining. Most technical challenges where met when the budget was at $300,000. Now at $10,000,000 they only have to update and maintain. Gardner is bringing WMF to a scale that could be used to seriously address programmatic and editorial issues. But she is not directing the funds in the right areas.

Well at least there is a planning process that could be turned toward programmatic issues. Plus, I love the Stalinist ring to "Five Year Plan." That has got to piss off the Randoids.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TungstenCarbide
post Wed 20th January 2010, 4:08pm
Post #4


Allegedly shot down by stray Ukrainian missile
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,405
Joined: Sat 14th Mar 2009, 6:12am
Member No.: 10,787

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 20th January 2010, 3:43pm) *

Sue Gardner has posted the new Five-Year Plan.

BayNewser sums it up as follows:

QUOTE
Wikimedia Not Going to Invest in China, Africa, Paid Editors


And my comment there:

QUOTE
In other words, the WMF will continue to geek out on hard drives, bandwidth, and marveling at how many page views they garner. But, they will do nothing to work responsibly and ethically toward building a higher-quality, reliable compendium of human knowledge. Thus driving home the truth that Wikipedia is a massive online role-playing game, not an educational charity project. In a word, fraudulent.

I wonder how long she worked on that and how much it cost.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Wed 20th January 2010, 4:10pm
Post #5


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Wed 20th January 2010, 11:06am) *
Plus, I love the Stalinist ring to "Five Year Plan." That has got to piss off the Randoids.


When she starts to suggest letting 100 flowers bloom, it is time to move the servers to Formosa! rolleyes.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
post Wed 20th January 2010, 4:30pm
Post #6


And the admins broke Piggy's glasses...
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed 25th Nov 2009, 2:23am
From: Hell, Your Majesty...
Member No.: 15,578

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Wed 20th January 2010, 3:56pm) *

Wut!? — No benchmarks for the wheat harvest?

Jon dizzy.gif


I'm sure Short Brigade Harvester Boris is working towards it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Wed 20th January 2010, 5:01pm
Post #7


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Wed 20th January 2010, 8:56am) *

Wut!? — No benchmarks for the wheat harvest?

Jon dizzy.gif

No. A wonderful new plan to divert all of WMF's resouces to growing ... sugarcane!

You know, in theory, with some data on server cost per power over the last decade, and the known chart of WMF article growth per year, it should in theory be possible to draw a curve with the correct SHAPE of WMF's actual expenditure need, if it was rational.

Of course, such a curve would need to be scaled, so it could be adjusted for best fit to WMF's equipment costs from 2001 to 2007 or something.

Then the fun begins, as we see how far the curve costs for technology THEN depart from theoretical need, under Sue's regime. Mark the gap "San Francisco sushi and parking."
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GlassBeadGame
post Wed 20th January 2010, 5:55pm
Post #8


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981



QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 20th January 2010, 12:01pm) *



Then the fun begins, as we see how far the curve costs for technology THEN depart from theoretical need, under Sue's regime. Mark the gap "San Francisco sushi and parking."


What I like about Gardner is she clearly does not want to run an organization with a staff smaller than a 7/11 and a budget the size of an adult foster care home with six residents. There are of course many ways that she could build WMF into a significant organization, not the least is to staff it with people to address program and editorial needs. Her problem is that she would run into ideological roadblocks if she stood up and acted in a responsible manner. I think she needs representation on her board from the PRC. They are a quarter of humanity after all. Until then pass the sushi.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Wed 20th January 2010, 6:38pm
Post #9


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,783
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 20th January 2010, 12:01pm) *

QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Wed 20th January 2010, 8:56am) *

Wut!? — No benchmarks for the wheat harvest?

Jon dizzy.gif


Mark the gap "San Francisco sushi and parking."


Just guessing, but I think you'll find that more and more donation dollars are going into raising more and more donation dollars, in other words, PR.

Anyone wanna buy a Golden Gate Bridgespan?

Jon dry.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Wed 20th January 2010, 6:44pm
Post #10


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Wed 20th January 2010, 10:55am) *

QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 20th January 2010, 12:01pm) *



Then the fun begins, as we see how far the curve costs for technology THEN depart from theoretical need, under Sue's regime. Mark the gap "San Francisco sushi and parking."


What I like about Gardner is she clearly does not want to run an organization with a staff smaller than a 7/11 and a budget the size of an adult foster care home with six residents. There are of course many ways that she could build WMF into a significant organization, not the least is to staff it with people to address program and editorial needs. Her problem is that she would run into ideological roadblocks if she stood up and acted in a responsible manner. I think she needs representation on her board from the PRC. They are a quarter of humanity after all. Until then pass the sushi.

She has Wing/Ting from Taiwan. Perhaps he might be induced to speak for PRC. wink.gif

SRSLY, unless PRC lets WP actually legally INTO their country, I think they should get bubkis. Yes, HK, I know they are no different from the UK and probably better. It's just that they can be difficult when it comes to, well, basic freedoms. Probably my own bias.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GlassBeadGame
post Wed 20th January 2010, 7:46pm
Post #11


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981



QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 20th January 2010, 1:44pm) *



SRSLY, unless PRC lets WP actually legally INTO their country, I think they should get bubkis. Yes, HK, I know they are no different from the UK and probably better. It's just that they can be difficult when it comes to, well, basic freedoms. Probably my own bias.


I have no love lost for the PRC. I would find very amusing a board discussion in which community types explain how flagged revisions is difficult to implement to people who bulldoze monasteries or run over people with tanks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post Wed 20th January 2010, 8:24pm
Post #12


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



It's very clear that the Foundation considers its most important metrics to be readership of and participation in the English Wikipedia, and it plans to focus all of its attention on increasing both of these numbers. This is, no doubt, because doing this will do more to increase donations than just about anything else they do.

It is clear that there is no interest in improving quality, and in fact they probably realize that quality measures will both reduce drama (which will reduce press attention and thus donations) and reduce participation (which will also reduce donations). So expect more of the same, and nothing new, from the WMF.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
victim of censorship
post Wed 20th January 2010, 8:59pm
Post #13


Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,166
Joined: Tue 6th Jan 2009, 8:33am
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640



QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 20th January 2010, 3:43pm) *

Sue Gardner has posted the new Five-Year Plan.

BayNewser sums it up as follows:

QUOTE
Wikimedia Not Going to Invest in China, Africa, Paid Editors


And my comment there:

QUOTE
In other words, the WMF will continue to geek out on hard drives, bandwidth, and marveling at how many page views they garner. But, they will do nothing to work responsibly and ethically toward building a higher-quality, reliable compendium of human knowledge. Thus driving home the truth that Wikipedia is a massive online role-playing game, not an educational charity project. In a word, fraudulent.


WOW!

QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Wed 20th January 2010, 5:55pm) *

QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 20th January 2010, 12:01pm) *



Then the fun begins, as we see how far the curve costs for technology THEN depart from theoretical need, under Sue's regime. Mark the gap "San Francisco sushi and parking."


What I like about Gardner is she clearly does not want to run an organization with a staff smaller than a 7/11 and a budget the size of an adult foster care home with six residents. There are of course many ways that she could build WMF into a significant organization, not the least is to staff it with people to address program and editorial needs. Her problem is that she would run into ideological roadblocks if she stood up and acted in a responsible manner. I think she needs representation on her board from the PRC. They are a quarter of humanity after all. Until then pass the sushi.


She needs to sustain her 1/2 mill each year..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MBisanz
post Wed 20th January 2010, 9:22pm
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun 13th Apr 2008, 6:00am
Member No.: 5,693

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Wed 20th January 2010, 5:10pm) *

QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Wed 20th January 2010, 11:06am) *
Plus, I love the Stalinist ring to "Five Year Plan." That has got to piss off the Randoids.


When she starts to suggest letting 100 flowers bloom, it is time to move the servers to Formosa! rolleyes.gif

Five year plans are quite common in business. I would be somewhat disappointed with any major corporation that didn't have a long-term strategic plan with specific dated goals. To do otherwise would rob the management of accountability for meeting those goals.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Thu 21st January 2010, 5:41pm
Post #15


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



Sue Gardner said:

QUOTE
We've interviewed 65 people, including Board and Advisory Board members, staff, editors, onlookers, critics, supporters, and external subject-matter-experts...


I looked over the list of people interviewed, and I failed to see one "critic" of the Wikimedia Foundation. (Could someone help me if you do see one?)

So, I asked on the Discussion page, if someone could enlighten us as to which "critics" were interviewed.

Philippe's two-step response:

QUOTE
18:03, 20 January 2010 Critics? Which one(s)? Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs) Deleted (content was: 'The letter says that "critics" were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project. I'd like to know which one(s) in particular. Considering ho...' (and the only contributor was 'Thekohser2'))
(link)

QUOTE
17:40, 20 January 2010 Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs) blocked Thekohser2 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked) ‎
(link)

Someone needs to slap that little man-boy Philippe across the face.

Has it really come to the point that simply asking which critic(s) were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project is a censored and blockable offense?

I hereby call on every Wikimedian in good standing to go to that Discussion page, and ask the same question, until it is answered.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Thu 21st January 2010, 9:41pm
Post #16


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 21st January 2010, 12:41pm) *

I hereby call on every Wikimedian in good standing to go to that Discussion page, and ask the same question, until it is answered.


I guess this is the part where WR ignores me, too.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Thu 21st January 2010, 10:00pm
Post #17


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,783
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 21st January 2010, 4:41pm) *

QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 21st January 2010, 12:41pm) *

I hereby call on every Wikimedian in good standing to go to that Discussion page, and ask the same question, until it is answered.


I guess this is the part where WR ignores me, too.


It's their board, Greg.

The more you act like it might have been legit, the more credibility you lend it.

Your time were better spent writing another exposé on Akahele.

Jon Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Fri 22nd January 2010, 4:49am
Post #18


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Thu 21st January 2010, 5:00pm) *

It's their board, Greg.

The more you act like it might have been legit, the more credibility you lend it.

Your time were better spent writing another exposé on Akahele.

Jon Image


Yeah, in a way, you're right, Jonny.

Akahele's still getting, oh, a good 15 page views a day... though that's down from our glory days of 65 or 70 per day.

Anyway, it looks like someone has my back here. Thanks, "whoever you are".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Fri 22nd January 2010, 5:06am
Post #19


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,783
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 21st January 2010, 11:49pm) *

QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Thu 21st January 2010, 5:00pm) *

It's their board, Greg.

The more you act like it might have been legit, the more credibility you lend it.

Your time were better spent writing another exposé on Akahele.

Jon Image


Yeah, in a way, you're right, Jonny.

Akahele's still getting, oh, a good 15 page views a day … though that's down from our glory days of 65 or 70 per day.

Anyway, it looks like someone has my back here. Thanks, "whoever you are".


It's pretty clear that the whole Strategic Planning thing is just a cover for a lot of PR. Maybe that Bridgespan Group honestly thinks they're being called in to help improve things, but they wouldn't be the first to be suckered by that.

Jon Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post Fri 22nd January 2010, 5:55am
Post #20


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 21st January 2010, 10:49pm) *
Akahele's still getting, oh, a good 15 page views a day... though that's down from our glory days of 65 or 70 per day.
Wow, dude, that's lame: my cheesy, sporadically updated blog about one of the most boring topics in the known universe gets an average 50 page views a day. What are you doing wrong? smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th 10 17, 11:14am