QUOTE(Eva Destruction @ Wed 24th February 2010, 12:57am)
QUOTE(everyking @ Tue 23rd February 2010, 11:33pm)
While most people favor an absolute interpretation of the one person per account rule, I don't really see the problem here. The other person is purely acting as conduit for Herostratus due to a special set of legal circumstances. I can't fault the guy for wanting to continue with his hobby, as long as the edits themselves aren't problematic.
Really? You can't see a problem with someone forbidden from using a computer using a proxy to edit
Child sexual abuse and
Children's rights movement?
But this proxy is court-appointed, right? And like I said, if there are problems with the edits themselves, that should be dealt with. I just don't think the specific method Herostratus is using to edit is a problem.