FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Chelsea Manning -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Discussions in this subforum are hidden from search engines.

However, they are not hidden from automobile engines, including the newer, more "environmentally-friendly" electric and hybrid engines. Also, please note that this subforum is meant to be used for discussion of the actual biographical articles themselves; more generalized discussions of BLP policy should be posted in the General Discussion or Bureaucracy forums.

> Chelsea Manning
occono
post
Post #1


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 23
Joined:
Member No.: 32,049



http://www.philipsandifer.com/2013/09/some...actory-how.html
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Tarc
post
Post #2


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined:
Member No.: 5,309



Sandifer is a middling twit. Just another in a long, sad line of limp-wristed bleeding-heart "progressive" types who tiptoe through life mortally afraid of causing anyone* the slightest bit offense at any time.


*Anyone except for whites, males, Christians, or some combination of the three, of course. For some silly reason, discrimination and ridicule is seen as acceptable and even encouraged in liberal circles.

PS - You misspelled "Bradley" in the title.

This post has been edited by Tarc:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Retrospect
post
Post #3


Londoner born and bred
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 263
Joined:
From: London
Member No.: 71,989



QUOTE(Tarc @ Sat 14th September 2013, 1:17am) *

Sandifer is a middling twit.

Yep, he's only middling. You've got nothing to fear from him; he's not in your league.
QUOTE
PS - You misspelled "Bradley" in the title.

What a fuckwit. You've missed the point entirely, as usual.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tarc
post
Post #4


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined:
Member No.: 5,309



QUOTE(Retrospect @ Sat 14th September 2013, 9:00pm) *

Yep, he's only middling. You've got nothing to fear from him; he's not in your league.


How, um, clever.

QUOTE
What a fuckwit. You've missed the point entirely, as usual.


I don't believe that I did, as my point was to note that this person is still very much "Bradley Manning" and still very much a "he", despite his wishes to the contrary.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Retrospect
post
Post #5


Londoner born and bred
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 263
Joined:
From: London
Member No.: 71,989



QUOTE(Tarc @ Tue 17th September 2013, 1:10am) *

QUOTE
What a fuckwit. You've missed the point entirely, as usual.


I don't believe that I did, as my point was to note that this person is still very much "Bradley Manning" and still very much a "he", despite his wishes to the contrary.

*Sigh* The point of the title is to emphasise that the controversy is about the spurious name change. It would have been too weak to title the thread "Bradley Manning".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)