 Discussion, General discussion about this forum |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| blissyu2 |
Post
#1
|
|
the wookie  Group: On Vacation Posts: 4,596 Joined: From: Australia Member No.: 5  |
Good idea for a game! Do we have to do an analysis on the first random article we come across, or can we wait until we find a bad one?
This has been the best topic since my (failed attempt) at "Article of the Weak". I still hope we can redo the Article of the Weak at some stage if anyone is game. You guys are better analyists than me with this stuff, but it makes good reading. |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| Ta bu shi da yu |
Post
#2
|
|
Neophyte Group: Contributors Posts: 5 Joined: Member No.: 154 |
Hmmm... I quite like this thread! Actual constructive criticism is always good for Wikipedia.
|
|
|
|
| Pwok |
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Contributors Posts: 187 Joined: Member No.: 2,462 |
QUOTE(Ta bu shi da yu @ Sat 29th April 2006, 10:22am)  Hmmm... I quite like this thread! Actual constructive criticism is always good for Wikipedia. Criticism need not be "constructive" to be good. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
blissyu2 Discussion 
everyking What they should do is make organized attempts at ... Blu Aardvark I wanted to bring this game back, because it is a ... blissyu2 My article of the weak didn't work too well, b... Selina since it's got it's own subforum now, not ... 
Blu Aardvark Yeah, the idea is to lend more room to in-depth ev... |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |