 Cheerleader vandalism!!!, Gimme a B, gimme an A, gimme an N... |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  |
| carbuncle |
 Sat 12th December 2009, 6:59pm
Post
#1
|
 Fat Cat  Group: Regulars Posts: 1,601 Joined: Sun 30th Mar 2008, 4:48pm Member No.: 5,544  |
Presented without comment, except to say that the PCHS-NJROTC character is hilarious, but a little too over-the-top to be believable. Which one of you guys is this?
"Cheerleader Vandalism" edit notice |
   |
 
|
| EricBarbour |
Sat 12th December 2009, 10:49pm
Post
#2
|
 blah Group: Regulars Posts: 5,919 Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am Member No.: 5,066 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
QUOTE This is edit-notice creep, as are already the Romeo editnotices. The impact on vandalism is nil and potentially inverse, while it confuses or scares away good-faith editors. Actually this is a good place to discuss on whether we should still use the romeo editnotices. Cenarium (talk) 02:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC) Great, next some twat will post a new policy, WP:EDIT NOTICE CREEP. Cheerleader vandals. Haw haw haw. That's a rich one.  Go to PCHS's userpage. Look at the userboxes. Just another teenaged asshole. (That reminds me. If you ever want to see a whole bunch of WP freaks throwing their weight around, the Wikipolitics blog is a real treat. Recognize any of the names on the userlist?) This post has been edited by EricBarbour: Sat 12th December 2009, 10:55pm |
|
|
|
| Premier player |
Mon 14th December 2009, 12:14pm
Post
#3
|
 New Member Group: Contributors Posts: 25 Joined: Thu 26th Nov 2009, 12:24pm Member No.: 15,604 |
How about a warning to "Expert vandals"?
"Wikipedia is not a place to demonstrate your subject knowledge. If you have been studying a subject for more than 20 years you are inferior to someone who wasn't born 20 years ago but has a vaguely relevant newspaper clipping." |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th 6 13, 8:10am |