FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Copyright infringement on the WR logo -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> Copyright infringement on the WR logo
Wikitaka
post
Post #1


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 24
Joined:
Member No.: 76,720



Wikipedia claims the right to use our logo under "fair use".

They claim that it is "low resolution", while the resolution is the same as here on the page. They also claim that "The entire logo is used to convey the meaning intended and avoid tarnishing or misrepresenting the intended image." As they use the logo in their article that is written with a conflict of interest and criticises us (or at least did in the past), it is used to misrepresent us.

On it goes, [...]assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about the organization[...]

Do you think it is time to open a file deletion debate over the obvious copyright infringement of our logo?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Heat
post
Post #2


Tenured
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 726
Joined:
Member No.: 1,066



Web Fred has a point, the "logo" is really just a typeface with a generic white hat.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post
Post #3


Can't actually moderate (or even post)
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,816
Joined:
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(Heat @ Sat 31st March 2012, 11:39am) *
Web Fred has a point, the "logo" is really just a typeface with a generic white hat.

Not only that, when I made the logo I didn't even use my own hat.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Web Fred
post
Post #4


Pervert & Swinger
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 739
Joined:
From: Manchester, UK
Member No.: 17,141



QUOTE(Somey @ Sun 1st April 2012, 2:22am) *

QUOTE(Heat @ Sat 31st March 2012, 11:39am) *
Web Fred has a point, the "logo" is really just a typeface with a generic white hat.

Not only that, when I made the logo I didn't even use my own hat.


Ah, but you did nick the Wikipedia globe to do the other graphic.

So whomever suggests a take down notice for the WR logo, I should point out that the shoe is really on the other foot.

And the other guy has more money!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)