| |
|
  |
WJBScribe withdraws, Decides he lacks sufficent time |
|
|
| C H |
Wed 10th December 2008, 10:59pm
|
Junior Member
 
Group: Contributors
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed 19th Apr 2006, 6:50pm
Member No.: 142

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Steve Crossin |
Thu 11th December 2008, 12:07am
|

New Member

Group: Contributors
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon 6th Oct 2008, 5:18am
From: Australia
Member No.: 8,557
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(wikiwhistle @ Thu 11th December 2008, 9:58am)  hmmmm...I wonder why he's withdrawn? And I was planning the most tactical voting ever  And no I don't think, as he says some people were in his explanation, that he wanted the position for its own sake, I just think he does things his influential friends want him to too much, or turns a blind eye to problems with his friends/those he likes' behaviour (most of us do.) And I think the powers that be wanted him in. I can see why people think he is a hat collector. That doesn't mean I agree with it. I don't think he wanted the position as much as people think he wanted it. I still think he'd have been a fine arb, but I guess it's not to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Son of a Yeti |
Thu 11th December 2008, 7:18am
|

High altitude member
   
Group: Regulars
Posts: 415
Joined: Sun 26th Oct 2008, 3:30pm
From: A hiding place in the Himalaya
Member No.: 8,704

|
He wrote: QUOTE It has now become clear to me in the last few days that this will not be the case and that the amount of time I will be able to dedicate to the project will be much reduced from now on.
I have therefore come to the conclusion that, even were I to have a level of support sufficient to be elected to the Arbitration Committee, I would not be able to offer the time that the position requires.
The only thing missing is that he want to devote more time to his family. Perhaps he has none. I'll cite an article on the very subject: http://virtuallinguist.typepad.com/the_vir...eir-family.htmlQUOTE Spending time with the family is the favourite euphemism of politicians who: a) fear they are about to be sacked, b) have major disagreements with the prime minister on policy (and thus fear they are about to be sacked) c) expect to lose their marginal seat in the next election and thus jump first (it gives them more time to find a cushy directorship) or d) are about to have an illicit affair made public.
Wouldn't point b) be the most probable? Of course as long as we can call Jimbo a prime minister 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |