FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Scholars who've asked for their biographies to be deleted -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Discussions in this subforum are hidden from search engines.

However, they are not hidden from automobile engines, including the newer, more "environmentally-friendly" electric and hybrid engines. Also, please note that this subforum is meant to be used for discussion of the actual biographical articles themselves; more generalized discussions of BLP policy should be posted in the General Discussion or Bureaucracy forums.

> Scholars who've asked for their biographies to be deleted, Catholics, Buddhists, feminists, Muslims ...
HRIP7
post
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 483
Joined:
Member No.: 17,020



Another scholar asking for his biography to be deleted:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Art...n#Ian_Dowbiggin

As far as I can make out, the biography was turned into an attack piece by a now-blocked sock, Jabbsworth (T-C-L-K-R-D) . The BLP subject has been blocked too as a "sockpuppeteer" (by Catfish Jim and the soapdish (T-C-L-K-R-D) ), after having made a grand total of 7 edits with two non-overlapping accounts. A prime example of Wikipedia assuming good faith, eh?

Nothing against secularism, but if it stoops to smearing academics because they follow a religious faith ... Dowbiggin is a Catholic, but there may be a wider pattern here, crossing religious boundaries. For example, last month a Buddhist feminist scholar requested deletion of her biography:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Art...n/Rita_M._Gross

and there was Abbas, a Muslim, as well:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Art...3rd_nomination)

Let's collect these cases here.

This post has been edited by HRIP7:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Silver seren
post
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 470
Joined:
Member No.: 36,940



I'm fixing up the article right now. There were clear problems with it, such as specially cherry-picked language from sources and even outright misattribution from sources or having the information not be in the source at all.

But Dowbiggin is clearly important in the euthanasia debate field. It'll take a little while to fix this all up, but i'll keep it looking good afterwards.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)