FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Jimbo's financial irregularities? -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Jimbo's financial irregularities?, merged with "WMF finances"
dogbiscuit
post
Post #1


Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more?
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2,972
Joined:
From: The Midlands
Member No.: 4,015



In amongst the tittle-tattle, there have been some bits and pieces popping out about how Jimbo has been misusing WMF funds and failing to keep proper account of his spending. It is rather reminiscent of that felon employee and the "no money is missing, but if it is, I'll pay it back myself" approach.

It would be a shame to have the proper exposure of these serious, potentially criminal activities covered up by Jimbo's mid-life crisis. What do we have courtesy of Danny?
  • WMF funding private expenses of Jimbo without any apparent control of his expenditure in advance.
  • Jimbo reimbursing inappropriate expenditure via a donation rather than a direct payment.
  • The suggestion that the reimbursement value was negotiated, rather than properly backed up by receipts. If this is the case, was the WMF in reality properly reimbursed?
  • If there have been substantial amounts ($30,000) owning for several months, then surely a charity should be reimbursed for the interest lost due to offering unauthorised free loans. These are not trivial amounts of money, and Jimbo should be repaying several thousand dollars for this.
  • We are also aware that Wikia Inc activities have been performed while Jimbo is on tour financed by WMF. How has Wikia Inc. reimbursed the WMF for its proportion of the costs?
  • I'm not sure of his point, but Danny seems to suggest that some payments that Jimbo took (honorariums), rightly belonged to the WMF - the "gold washing machine".
I think if I was the auditor of the WMF, I'd be rather nervous of my professional standing. We are told, by Jimbo, that all these indiscretions are in the past, but as the auditing process did not make these issues public, did not qualify the accounts or bring these to the attention of the public, we simply wonder what other issues are lurking to be found out. Jimbo does not have any moral concerns about abusing the charity status of the WMF, as he does not generally seem to be troubled by morals.

I should think Jimbo will have a busy couple of days getting his expense claims squeaky clean. once he has finished dealing with his other dirty laundry.

I'm pretty sure that in the UK the charity commission would be breathing all over him by now. Time for Jimbo to step down from WMF.

This post has been edited by dogbiscuit:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Somey
post
Post #2


Can't actually moderate (or even post)
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,816
Joined:
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(Unrepentant Vandal @ Mon 3rd March 2008, 11:49pm) *
There's a lot of disappointing schaudenfreude on this website at the moment.

I'd hardly call it schadenfreude... If anything, I suspect most of us are quite envious of Jimbo's ability to use his position on a mere website to score with hot right-wing media babes.

And have you ever asked yourself why there aren't more left-wing media babes? Like, maybe the same reason why so many media figures tagged as "liberal" are actually comedians? Think about it.

QUOTE(Kato @ Mon 3rd March 2008, 11:56pm) *
QUOTE(Danny Wool)
Are you willing to state unequivocally that Jimmy Wales never wrote a check to the WMF to reimburse the WMF for his personal expenses?

I'm not sure I'm following this - is he saying that it would have been wrong for Jimbo to reimburse the foundation for such expenditures, or that he had been compelled to do so (for whatever reason) and Sue Gardner has been effectively denying it? Presumably the latter, right?

Given that Jimbo has traditionally kept the fees received from his speaking engagements and other personal appearances for himself, while insisting that others (such as Angela) turn theirs over to the foundation, I'd have to say that he really should bear all the expenses incurred from travel to and from speaking engagements. Sex romps with former BLP victims are a different story, though... The foundation should definitely pay for those, I would think. Why else would you have a foundation in the first place, if not to pay for things like that?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post
Post #3


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Somey @ Tue 4th March 2008, 2:15am) *

Given that Jimbo has traditionally kept the fees received from his speaking engagements and other personal appearances for himself, while insisting that others (such as Angela) turn theirs over to the foundation, I'd have to say that he really should bear all the expenses incurred from travel to and from speaking engagements.


Sorry to resurrect this old thread, but someone was asking me if it was true that Jimbo pockets all of his speaking engagement money, even if he spends most of the time talking about the non-profit Wikipedia project.

So, I wanted to provide this important link to when this practice was established.

Over on the Foundation-l archives themselves, the post is entirely rendered in a crazy format, perhaps so that people won't actually read it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)