FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Whose Money Is It Anyway? -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Whose Money Is It Anyway?
dogbiscuit
post
Post #1


Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more?
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2,972
Joined:
From: The Midlands
Member No.: 4,015



From the minutes:

QUOTE
Second tranche of WMF grant (AT)
AT would like the authority to pay a second tranche to the WMF. CK expressed the view that the sooner we give the WMF the grant, the better: however, MP expressed an opposing viewpoint, that we wait until certain key agreements are signed before finalising the payment.
JD wants to know if they have formally applied for a grant from us: AT said that we do have an official letter from the WMF asking for a grant. The third tranche will wait until the accounts are finalised.
DECISION: To pay the remaining £200k grant to the WMF and follow up with Barry Newstead re: the fundraising agreement. AT also has authority to transfer a third tranche once the accounts are finalised, as long as that amount is less than £45k.
ACTION: RB and AT to pay the second tranche and contact Barry Newstead.

So having been gifted a large chunk of money by virtue of a website diversion to their own fundraising page, Wikimedia UK contemplate playing hardball over lack of finalising agreements.

Intriguing that Wikimedia UK think in terms of it being their money to grant to the WMF. I wonder what WMF think about such debates.

I also wonder about this grant application business, seems like glorified money laundering to me. I wonder what HM Customs and Revenue think about these schemes. Just to be clear, WMF do fund-raising on their website. They divert UK clicks to a UK based company who nominally are in receipt of the moneys and are able to get tax back based on the UK based company being a charity but in practice have to hand the money back to the WMF. So the UK based company has not actually sought the donations, it has not provided any significant labour or effort to garner these donations. It has simply processed them, with a bit of paperwork to claim the tax back on behalf of a US company. Probably worth a chat with a friendly tax accountant or two that I know.

Thinks, it should also be fun to nitpick and worry through all the minutes so they get so paranoid that they hold everything in secret. Then they might learn why information does not like being free after all.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
dogbiscuit   Whose Money Is It Anyway?  
lilburne   [i]Thinks, it should also be fun to nitpick and ...  
HRIP7   The minutes mention two interesting new Wikimedia ...  
dogbiscuit   The striking thing about the friendly space polic...  
Kelly Martin   Of course, taking that policy wording to its Wikip...  
HRIP7   From the [url=http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Minute...  
dogbiscuit   The memo referred to is the [url=http://meta.wik...  
TungstenCarbide   Who is the driver for chapters anyway? All that ef...  
EricBarbour   Who is the driver for chapters anyway? That is a ...  
SB_Johnny   It shouldn't be surprising that the WMF would ...  
dogbiscuit   I defy any of you to read the "official fund...  
HRIP7   [quote name='EricBarbour' post='298046' date='Thu...  
jayvdb   [quote name='HRIP7' post='298025' date='Thu 16th ...  
dogbiscuit   My reading of that is that the WMF don't see...  
jayvdb   I think that is a sound point. The trouble is tha...  
Peter Damian   But as annual donations have increased tenfold ov...  
jayvdb   Quite the reverse. Philippe’s research ...  
dogbiscuit   [quote name='Peter Damian' post='298078' date='Fr...  
jayvdb   I think that the process of how the Wikimedia UK ...  
SB_Johnny   What questions has Peter asked? See this very lo...  
jayvdb   [quote name='jayvdb' post='298084' date='Fri 17th...  
Peter Damian   Did WMUK provide the requested documents, or has ...  
SB_Johnny   Here in Australia we could immediately become a ch...  
jayvdb   [quote name='jayvdb' post='298098' date='Fri 17th...  
Kelly Martin   Unfortunately the 2012 RCC was less productive as ...  
jayvdb   [quote name='jayvdb' post='298136' date='Fri 17th...  
Peter Damian   Ugh. I got as far as reading [url=http://www.exa...  
Peter Damian   Note the very emotional objections on the talk pag...  
Silenteditor   I also wonder about this grant application busin...  
Rufus   I also wonder about this grant application busi...  
lilburne   WMUK would, however, have to call it a fundraisin...  
EricBarbour   It disgusts me that "Wikipedian", and ...  
jayvdb   It disgusts me that "Wikipedian", and ...  
Eppur si muove   It disgusts me that "Wikipedian", and ...  


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)