FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Was this a BLP violation -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Discussions in this subforum are hidden from search engines.

However, they are not hidden from automobile engines, including the newer, more "environmentally-friendly" electric and hybrid engines. Also, please note that this subforum is meant to be used for discussion of the actual biographical articles themselves; more generalized discussions of BLP policy should be posted in the General Discussion or Bureaucracy forums.

> Was this a BLP violation
mbz1
post
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined:
Member No.: 25,791



I wonder if this edit was a BLP violation. The user was blocked indefinetely over it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
EricBarbour
post
Post #2


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066



Gwen Gale never changes.....too stupid to realize the political statement of that picture (that the Duke lacrosse scandal article is utter defamatory crap), and too humorless to realize she's been trolled.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mbz1
post
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined:
Member No.: 25,791



QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 10th October 2011, 12:58am) *

Gwen Gale never changes.....too stupid to realize the political statement of that picture (that the Duke lacrosse scandal article is utter defamatory crap), and too humorless to realize she's been trolled.


Actually Gwen Gale has changed quite a bit. The only thing that has not changed about her,
is her considering herself to be one the most important users, and behaving as such.

Here's Gwen Gale - a blocked user
QUOTE
There are too many of them for me here, too many role-playing troll admins, too many troll sockpuppet editors. Bye then. Gwen Gale 06:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


and here's Gwen Gale - a blocking admin
QUOTE
Owing to the above trolling, I have locked your talk page. [[User:Gwen Gale|Gwen Gale]] ([[User talk:Gwen Gale|talk]]) 12:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


or another example Here Gwen Gale, when she still was Wyss (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) is talking about ArbCom
QUOTE
Anyway I disagree that I ever disrupted Wikipedia or ever had the personal potential or whim to do that. My contribution history speaks for itself. I've been slapped hard by arbcomm for expressing my opinion that among them lurk wankers, fiddlers, fools and trolls who coddle their own kind. [[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 07:54, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


And here Gwen Gale nominates herself for ArbCom (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif)

Is she stupid and humorless? Maybe, maybe no, but she is a bully for sure, a power hungry bully, who never should have been an admin in the first place.
Back to the block of RCS. It is one bad block, removing the talk page access over this very innocent post is harassment and misusing of the tools. I challenge arbitrators, who read this post to revert the idiotic block made by a bully administrator.

This post has been edited by mbz1:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)