Starting new thread where we can investigate the possibility that perhaps the ArbCom is right.
Come on, we've got accusers putting together cute little charts and graphs and submitting them as "evidence", self-appointed do-gooders poring over edit histories, investigating trips to India, stuff that would make Durova herself embarrassed to admit to.
On the other hand we have Overstock.com, a company that, as ED might say, is full of fail.
Some "evidence":
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=OSTK&t=2yIf we must play amateur sleuth, or follow the money, or do whatever it is that investigative web forum participants are supposed to be doing, shouldn't we consider the possibility that Overstock.com, a multimillion dollar company with a financial interest in discrediting Wikipedia, is behind some of this drama?
Look again at the timing of this story and Wordbomb's latest crusade vs. the stock price of OSTK. It's no wonder they feel like Wall Street doesn't like them. The company clearly has nothing to offer its investors except excuses.
Overstock vs. Wikipedia, She kidnapped herself
