 Most crappy important article |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Doc glasgow |
Post
#1
|
|
Wikipedia:The Sump of All Human Knowledge  Group: Regulars Posts: 1,138 Joined: From: at home Member No.: 90  |
Muammar Gaddafi is an evil dictator. But even evil dictators don't deserve such shit wiki-bios.
It got me wondering - what's the most crappy article on a really important core topic that anyone can find on Wikipedia? Is the Gaddafi bio just bad because he's controversial. |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| Cock-up-over-conspiracy |
Post
#2
|
|
Now censored by flckr.com and who else ... ??? Group: Regulars Posts: 1,693 Joined: Member No.: 9,267 |
QUOTE(Doc glasgow @ Tue 22nd March 2011, 10:18pm)  Muammar Gaddafi is an evil dictator. But even evil dictators don't deserve such shit wiki-bios. Wikipedia is the rabble's only chance to throw their shoes at their preferred demiurge, or villain de nos jours. It would be much easier to list "Least crappy article", there are far fewer of them. The fumbling lede of Sexual intercourse is a study in the typical sweaty crapitutude of the porno-pedia. And, of course, it comes quickly with its own 'sausage in the hole' 'reader's wife' photo that I am sure 13 years boys are very grateful for. It is a wonder how my generation ever worked out how to have sex given that we only had technical line drawings in a Victorian Encyclopedia Britannia to work out how to do it. Any who of you have ever used the word "outercourse" enough to warrant its erection to the second paragraph? |
|
|
|
| Milton Roe |
Post
#3
|
|
Known alias of J. Random Troll Group: Regulars Posts: 10,209 Joined: Member No.: 5,156 |
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Wed 23rd March 2011, 8:16am) It is a wonder how my generation ever worked out how to have sex given that we only had technical line drawings in a Victorian Encyclopedia Britannia to work out how to do it. I wonder if the print editions of Britannica of a few generations ago, even had line drawings. Anybody know? Back in the barnyard days of agrarian America, I suppose they could watch barnyard antics. Which would lead to a lot of French or doggy style stuff perhaps. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/dry.gif) I seem to recall that the Romans had a little sex stool that the man sat on, and sex was often not face-to-face. Goodness. Perhaps these furniture items served as wedding gifts in the days before toasters. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Doc glasgow Most crappy important article 
Malleus That's an interesting question, but wp article... 
Doc glasgow
That's an interesting question, but wp articl... Emperor WWII. It's a top 20 article, and has major er... thekohser Doc, if you can define "importance" for ... Doc glasgow
Doc, if you can define "importance" for... EricBarbour WP articles on major corporations tend to be eithe... Versa I think that the article on asshole http://en.wiki... melloden They already made a list at this page. So just go ... Milton Roe
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entertainment]E... thekohser
Go ahead, try any Fortune 500 firm's name.
I... Peter Damian
[quote name='Cock-up-over-conspira... melloden
This sort of thing. [url=http://www.nlm.nih.gov/... EricBarbour Texas Towers is a miserable excuse for an article.... Eva Destruction
It got me wondering - what's the most crappy ... Silver seren
It got me wondering - what's the most crappy... Eva Destruction
Agreed, wow. IT is one of the fastest growing fie... Eva Destruction Honorable mention for Factory as well. |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |