The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> POLL: Wikipedia Privacy, Does it matter?
POLL: Wikipedia Privacy
Should the real/outside world respect Wikipedia's policies of anonymous editing and privacy? If answering Yes, please explain below in a comment "why".
Yes. [ 2 ] ** [22.22%]
No. [ 7 ] ** [77.78%]
Do Wikipedia's policies of anonymous editing and privacy have any application for anything not on Wikimedia Foundation domain name space, web sites, or IP addresses? If answering Yes, please explain below in a comment "why".
Yes. [ 1 ] ** [11.11%]
No. [ 8 ] ** [88.89%]
Do Wikimedia/Wikipedia editors have any legal right in the State of Florida, or the United States, to privacy extended to them via the WMF/WP policies? If answering Yes, please explain below in a comment "why".
Yes. [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
No. [ 9 ] ** [100.00%]
Is it appropriate to tie WMF/WP usernames to "IRL" identities to illustrate conflicts of interests, deception to the community (Community being on-Wikipedia or "IRL"), or abuses/wrong doing where the IRL identity of the WMF/WP editor plays a role in that misdeed? If you answer "no", please post a comment explaining why you think not below.
Yes. [ 9 ] ** [100.00%]
No. [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Total Votes: 36
Guests cannot vote 
Infoboy
post Thu 2nd August 2007, 8:23pm
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon 16th Jul 2007, 6:30pm
Member No.: 1,983



NOTE: Outside/real world refers to any venue, website, body, or place outside of Wikipedia, ranging from one on one conversation (IRL, email, phone, Instant messaging) up to other websites (news sources, Wikis, message boards) up to legal/government agencies, or anything in between. Basically, anything not hosted on Wikimedia Foundation IP addresses/domain names.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Infoboy
post Fri 3rd August 2007, 5:49pm
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon 16th Jul 2007, 6:30pm
Member No.: 1,983



Bump, and someone answered Yes to question one. Why? Please explain.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
blissyu2
post Fri 3rd August 2007, 7:23pm
Post #3


the wookie
*********

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 4,596
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 12:14am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Infoboy, with all due respect, that's a rigged poll, and somewhat of a bully poll too. I'd suggest that you make a new one, with the same questions, but get rid of the "If you say yes, please explain why". It's kind of threatening to word it in that way. Maybe you didn't mean it like that, but that's how it comes across. If you can create a new poll, with the same things, but none of the "Please explain yourself" stuff, then I think someone can delete this for you. Or else perhaps Somey or someone can just edit out that bit so its less aggressive. Or I guess we will all just ignore it.

I voted "Yes" on the first question, by the way, because quite honestly this is the internet, and there are very good reasons why people are often anonymous over the internet. I can link to a place that says my real name, but I won't directly say it on here, not my full name. I can tell you that my first name is Adrian and that Louisa Meredith is my great great great great great grand-mother, on my father's side, but I can't tell you my name. I am very much worried that if I do then some sicko out there will use it to stalk me. Perhaps its a bit paranoid, but once bitten twice shy you know.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Infoboy
post Fri 3rd August 2007, 8:38pm
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon 16th Jul 2007, 6:30pm
Member No.: 1,983



How would you word it to get an idea of why people think the outside world (new media, government, etc., lone people) should respect WP's privacy policies?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GlassBeadGame
post Fri 3rd August 2007, 8:48pm
Post #5


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981



QUOTE(Infoboy @ Fri 3rd August 2007, 2:38pm) *

How would you word it to get an idea of why people think the outside world (new media, government, etc., lone people) should respect WP's privacy policies?


I think the question is backward. Users (and anyone visiting the site) have rights vis a vis the WMF because of the WMF Privacy Policy. It creates a reasonable expectation of privacy. If WMF (through Checkuser or otherwise) violates the policy any person harmed by reliance on that expectation can seek damages under Florida (and possibly other) laws.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Infoboy
post Fri 3rd August 2007, 9:21pm
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon 16th Jul 2007, 6:30pm
Member No.: 1,983



QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Fri 3rd August 2007, 1:48pm) *

QUOTE(Infoboy @ Fri 3rd August 2007, 2:38pm) *

How would you word it to get an idea of why people think the outside world (new media, government, etc., lone people) should respect WP's privacy policies?


I think the question is backward. Users (and anyone visiting the site) have rights vis a vis the WMF because of the WMF Privacy Policy. It creates a reasonable expectation of privacy. If WMF (through Checkuser or otherwise) violates the policy any person harmed by reliance on that expectation can seek damages under Florida (and possibly other) laws.


Er, I think this is being mixed up. My goal is to see specifically if people believe that the outside world (non-WMF) has any moral, ethical, or legal obligation or duty to adhere to, honor, or respect the WMF's privacy policies.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GlassBeadGame
post Fri 3rd August 2007, 9:39pm
Post #7


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981



QUOTE(Infoboy @ Fri 3rd August 2007, 3:21pm) *



Er, I think this is being mixed up. My goal is to see specifically if people believe that the outside world (non-WMF) has any moral, ethical, or legal obligation or duty to adhere to, honor, or respect the WMF's privacy policies.


WP has a Privacy Policy, which is linked to on the bottom of each and every page on the site. This only creates obligations for WMF and its agents. It is not something outsiders can adhere to or not. They are intended to benefit from it. Maybe you mean something more generic by "privacy policies" such as abiding by "no outing" rules. No I don't think the outside world has to abide by that kind of thing. Of course WP could always ban people who won't comply. If someone, god forbid, actually harmed someone (defamed, scuffed their sneakers, wiki-raped) while "outing" the individual harmed might have a cause of action but WMF would not have standing as a plaintiff (possible WMF could be a co-defendant.)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
blissyu2
post Sat 4th August 2007, 3:22am
Post #8


the wookie
*********

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 4,596
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 12:14am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



There's nothing wrong with your question. Just the "If you say yes, please explain" is trying to force the person voting to vote in the way that you want them to. That's the issue.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Infoboy
post Sat 4th August 2007, 3:26am
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon 16th Jul 2007, 6:30pm
Member No.: 1,983



I was just looking for people to explain why they felt the way that they do.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th 5 13, 12:33pm